H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tamara Zidansek vs Bernarda Pera H2H: 1-1
Tamara Zidansek and Bernarda Pera are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bernarda Pera leads 1–0 on clay, while Tamara Zidansek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamara Zidansek won the 2021 US Open first round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 28
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tamara Zidansek | 6-4 7-6(4) | Bernarda Pera | Match data |
| May 12, 2021* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Bernarda Pera | 6-3 6-2 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2019 | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Bernarda Pera | 7-5 7-5 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Zidansek | #148 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,800 | 83 | 92 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Bernarda Pera | #314 | #27 | 1,519 | 1,836 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Bernarda Pera | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #62 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #148 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #71 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |