H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Tamara Zidansek vs Christina Mchale
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Tamara Zidansek vs Christina Mchale.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 28
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Zidansek | #148 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,800 | 83 | 92 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 166 | 207 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Christina Mchale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #33 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2026 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #148 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 |