H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tamara Zidansek vs Madison Brengle H2H: 1-0

Tamara Zidansek holds a 1–0 lead over Madison Brengle in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamara Zidansek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tamara Zidansek won the 2021 Roland Garros second round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tamara Zidansek
Slovenia Age 28 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamara Zidansek #85 6-4 6-1 Madison Brengle #84 Match data Jun 2, 2021* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tamara Zidansek #146 #22 1,991 1,803 80 91 46.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tamara Zidansek Madison Brengle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0
19 2017 0–1 0.0% #132 1,483 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0
20 2018 7–7 50.0% #79 1,632 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0
21 2019 15–19 44.1% #65 1,642 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0
22 2020 6–9 40.0% #87 1,613 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0
23 2021 25–18 58.1% #30 1,726 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2022 13–19 40.6% #85 1,595 0 1 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0
25 2023 6–8 42.9% #103 1,677 0 1 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0
26 2024 4–6 40.0% #181 1,638 0 1 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0
27 2025 0–1 0.0% #161 1,593 0 1 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0
28 2026 4–3 57.1% #146 1,696 0 1 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tamara Zidansek Madison Brengle
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2018 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2019 4 8 12 33.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2020 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2021 9 12 21 42.9% 16 5 21 76.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2022 8 9 17 47.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2023 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2024 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2026 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 34 51 85 40.0% 42 33 75 56.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 164/170 of Tamara Zidansek's and 225/246 of Madison Brengle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tamara Zidansek Madison Brengle
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3%
19 2017 1/1 1.0 4.0 68.3% 46.5% 55.0% 50.0% 75.0% 49.2% 38.9% 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5%
20 2018 14/14 0.6 3.5 65.4% 57.7% 42.3% 44.7% 51.2% 52.5% 48.6% 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2%
21 2019 33/34 1.2 2.8 68.5% 58.2% 42.0% 53.9% 44.6% 53.1% 42.8% 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6%
22 2020 15/15 0.7 3.2 68.3% 59.5% 47.5% 55.0% 48.5% 55.6% 43.3% 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7%
23 2021 41/43 1.2 3.7 64.9% 62.8% 45.6% 49.4% 50.9% 56.7% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2022 30/32 1.3 3.6 63.1% 61.5% 42.8% 49.8% 48.5% 54.3% 41.4% 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3%
25 2023 14/14 0.5 3.7 68.0% 54.9% 43.2% 53.3% 54.1% 51.1% 46.1% 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3%
26 2024 10/10 0.4 4.5 63.5% 57.8% 38.8% 46.4% 36.2% 51.2% 40.2% 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1%
28 2026 6/7 1.7 4.7 59.6% 64.0% 44.6% 51.1% 61.9% 55.8% 47.8% 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0%
Career — 164/171 1.0 3.5 65.7% 59.9% 43.7% 50.7% 48.9% 54.2% 43.9% — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tamara Zidansek Madison Brengle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40
19 2017 1484 98.5 -0.11 -0.64 0.766 44.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.15 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06
20 2018 1632 116.1 -1.96 +2.38 1.024 50.4% -117 +98 — 55.2% +0.24 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.28 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
21 2019 1642 115.3 -2.75 -0.57 0.912 48.3% -135 +147 -8 43.4% -0.60 9–8 (53%) 3–2 (60%) 101.4 -0.17 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03
22 2020 1613 128.8 -0.74 +0.40 0.974 49.8% -65 +134 — 47.2% -0.06 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) 96.1 -0.44 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16
23 2021 1727 132.9 +0.46 +0.75 1.038 50.9% -162 +227 — 54.1% +0.16 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 108.2 +0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2022 1596 120.1 -1.76 -0.99 0.907 47.9% +16 +119 -18 41.7% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 99.0 +1.49 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14
25 2023 1678 119.9 -2.90 +0.63 0.942 48.6% -80 +129 — 48.5% -0.64 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 99.0 -0.10 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20
26 2024 1638 109.0 -2.73 -2.13 0.825 45.6% -61 +156 — 36.0% -1.32 4–1 (80%) 2–0 — +0.29 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69
27 2025 1593 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.05 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.74
28 2026 1696 113.2 -0.32 +0.55 1.081 51.7% -12 +34 — 52.9% +0.18 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.34 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1804 125.4 -1.42 +0.07 0.958 49.2% -86 +153 -14 46.9% -0.34 33–32 (51%) 27–16 (63%) 106.1 +0.86 — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.