H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Tamara Zidansek vs Mirjam Bjorklund H2H: 1-0
Tamara Zidansek holds a 1–0 lead over Mirjam Bjorklund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamara Zidansek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tamara Zidansek won the 2023 Bogota fourth round 7-6(3) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 28
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 27
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2023* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Tamara Zidansek | 7-6(3) 7-6(3) | Mirjam Bjorklund | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2023 | Miami | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Mirjam Bjorklund | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Zidansek | #148 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,800 | 83 | 92 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mirjam Bjorklund | #766 | #123 | 527 | 1,618 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Mirjam Bjorklund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #620 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #166 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #148 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |