H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tamara Zidansek vs Petra Martic H2H: 0-3

Petra Martic holds a 3–0 lead over Tamara Zidansek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Petra Martic leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Martic won the 2022 Indian Wells Open second round 7-5 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tamara Zidansek
Slovenia Age 28 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Petra Martic
Croatia Age 35 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Martic #79 7-5 7-6(6) Tamara Zidansek #22 Match data Mar 12, 2022* R64 Indian Wells Open WTA 1000 Hard
Petra Martic #22 6-4 4-6 6-1 Tamara Zidansek #66 Match data Aug 28, 2019* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Petra Martic #40 3-6 6-1 6-3 Tamara Zidansek #68 Match data Apr 25, 2019* R32 Istanbul International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tamara Zidansek #146 #22 1,991 1,803 80 91 46.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Petra Martic #349 #14 2,850 1,938 212 215 49.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tamara Zidansek Petra Martic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #330 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2008 2–1 66.7% #215 1,505 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2009 6–7 46.2% #82 1,538 0 0
19 2017 0–1 0.0% #132 1,483 0 0 2010 5–14 26.3% #142 1,516 0 0
20 2018 7–7 50.0% #79 1,632 0 0 2011 16–14 53.3% #50 1,621 0 0
21 2019 15–19 44.1% #65 1,642 0 0 2012 18–18 50.0% #59 1,691 0 0
22 2020 6–9 40.0% #87 1,613 0 0 2013 7–12 36.8% #107 1,607 0 0
23 2021 25–18 58.1% #30 1,726 0 1 2014 1–8 11.1% #186 1,515 0 0
24 2022 13–19 40.6% #85 1,595 0 1 2015 0–8 0.0% #148 1,435 0 0
25 2023 6–8 42.9% #103 1,677 0 1 2016 3–3 50.0% #262 1,525 0 0
26 2024 4–6 40.0% #181 1,638 0 1 2017 6–4 60.0% #89 1,613 0 0
27 2025 0–1 0.0% #161 1,593 0 1 2018 26–17 60.5% #32 1,798 0 0
28 2026 4–3 57.1% #146 1,721 0 1 2019 36–17 67.9% #15 1,901 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2020 14–11 56.0% #18 1,804 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2021 15–21 41.7% #54 1,656 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2022 25–17 59.5% #38 1,796 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2023 20–19 51.3% #40 1,806 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2024 9–19 32.1% #122 1,635 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2025 3–4 42.9% #209 1,606 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tamara Zidansek Petra Martic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2018 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2011 11 9 20 55.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2019 4 8 12 33.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2020 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2021 9 12 21 42.9% 16 5 21 76.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2022 8 9 17 47.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2015 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2023 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2024 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
27 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 18 10 28 64.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2026 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 14 12 26 53.8% 16 3 19 84.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 11 9 20 55.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 5 11 16 31.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 34 51 85 40.0% 42 33 75 56.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — 109 129 238 45.8% 77 63 140 55.0% 24 21 45 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 164/170 of Tamara Zidansek's and 406/427 of Petra Martic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tamara Zidansek Petra Martic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 4.0 3.0 51.0% 75.5% 55.3% 50.0% 33.3% 65.6% 38.4%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/3 3.0 5.5 66.8% 69.2% 33.8% 56.3% 66.7% 57.6% 48.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 12/13 2.0 3.0 60.5% 63.9% 45.2% 60.5% 50.2% 57.0% 40.2%
19 2017 1/1 1.0 4.0 68.3% 46.5% 55.0% 50.0% 75.0% 49.2% 38.9% 2010 18/19 2.4 4.3 62.9% 60.8% 45.8% 55.5% 38.6% 55.0% 37.5%
20 2018 14/14 0.6 3.5 65.4% 57.7% 42.3% 44.7% 51.2% 52.5% 48.6% 2011 27/30 3.8 5.3 56.2% 64.5% 47.1% 50.8% 38.7% 56.7% 41.6%
21 2019 33/34 1.2 2.8 68.5% 58.2% 42.0% 53.9% 44.6% 53.1% 42.8% 2012 35/36 4.6 4.3 57.8% 65.0% 45.4% 53.3% 48.4% 56.5% 40.2%
22 2020 15/15 0.7 3.2 68.3% 59.5% 47.5% 55.0% 48.5% 55.6% 43.3% 2013 16/19 4.2 5.4 60.1% 62.7% 45.0% 52.2% 33.9% 55.5% 40.1%
23 2021 41/43 1.2 3.7 64.9% 62.8% 45.6% 49.4% 50.9% 56.7% 45.0% 2014 7/9 3.7 4.0 53.2% 61.9% 39.2% 50.3% 47.2% 51.5% 35.3%
24 2022 30/32 1.3 3.6 63.1% 61.5% 42.8% 49.8% 48.5% 54.3% 41.4% 2015 6/8 4.2 5.3 56.0% 64.0% 40.8% 47.3% 50.6% 54.3% 30.8%
25 2023 14/14 0.5 3.7 68.0% 54.9% 43.2% 53.3% 54.1% 51.1% 46.1% 2016 6/6 4.0 4.7 66.0% 62.8% 47.5% 57.2% 40.4% 57.6% 39.3%
26 2024 10/10 0.4 4.5 63.5% 57.8% 38.8% 46.4% 36.2% 51.2% 40.2% 2017 10/10 3.4 2.7 68.9% 66.1% 50.3% 55.1% 51.5% 61.0% 45.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 43/43 3.2 2.2 62.8% 66.7% 48.8% 56.4% 43.9% 60.2% 42.8%
28 2026 6/7 1.7 4.7 62.0% 63.9% 44.0% 51.1% 61.9% 55.8% 47.8% 2019 52/53 2.6 2.7 64.0% 66.8% 49.8% 59.9% 49.1% 60.7% 44.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 25/25 3.2 2.6 61.7% 65.2% 50.7% 64.0% 39.1% 59.6% 41.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 36/36 3.8 2.8 58.8% 66.3% 46.7% 51.1% 43.6% 58.1% 39.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 42/42 4.5 3.3 60.1% 67.7% 49.2% 48.0% 43.3% 60.1% 40.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 38/39 4.8 3.4 57.1% 68.6% 47.9% 56.2% 40.1% 60.0% 39.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 27/28 4.4 3.5 58.8% 67.3% 42.8% 47.6% 49.7% 57.1% 37.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 3/7 1.7 3.7 62.1% 57.5% 38.4% 45.6% 35.6% 50.5% 41.2%
Career — 164/171 1.0 3.5 65.7% 59.9% 43.7% 50.7% 48.9% 54.2% 43.9% — 406/427 3.7 3.4 60.3% 65.9% 47.2% 54.3% 44.1% 58.4% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tamara Zidansek Petra Martic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1480 97.4 -1.36 -1.85 1.117 51.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1506 104.8 -0.42 +0.18 1.145 53.2% +19 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — +0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1539 112.1 +0.24 -2.39 0.933 48.5% +1 +22 — 50.0% -0.21 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.36
19 2017 1484 98.5 -0.11 -0.64 0.766 44.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.15 2010 1517 116.5 -0.78 -3.50 0.832 46.5% +35 -37 — 31.8% -1.23 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.85
20 2018 1632 116.1 -1.96 +2.38 1.024 50.4% -117 +98 — 55.2% +0.24 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.28 2011 1622 125.1 +0.45 -1.86 0.961 48.9% +17 -104 — 51.4% +0.07 10–4 (71%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.97
21 2019 1642 115.3 -2.75 -0.57 0.912 48.3% -135 +147 -8 43.4% -0.60 9–8 (53%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.17 2012 1692 131.0 +0.67 -2.20 0.926 48.6% -8 -98 — 48.8% -0.17 8–4 (67%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.21
22 2020 1613 128.8 -0.74 +0.40 0.974 49.8% -65 +134 — 47.2% -0.06 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.44 2013 1607 115.3 -1.25 -2.67 0.900 48.0% -10 -6 +18 41.9% -0.47 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.05
23 2021 1727 132.9 +0.46 +0.75 1.038 50.9% -162 +227 — 54.1% +0.16 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) — +0.90 2014 1516 93.7 -1.25 -4.62 0.729 43.8% +28 — — 17.6% -2.53 0–1 1–1 — +0.24
24 2022 1596 120.1 -1.76 -0.99 0.907 47.9% +16 +119 -18 41.7% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.49 2015 1435 105.3 -1.11 -3.28 0.673 43.0% +70 +50 — 0.0% -3.06 — — — -0.11
25 2023 1678 119.9 -2.90 +0.63 0.942 48.6% -80 +129 — 48.5% -0.64 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.10 2016 1525 114.6 -0.08 -2.76 0.925 48.4% — +9 — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.05
26 2024 1638 109.0 -2.73 -2.13 0.825 45.6% -61 +156 — 36.0% -1.32 4–1 (80%) 2–0 — +0.29 2017 1613 126.9 +3.52 +1.52 1.162 53.0% — +3 +54 60.0% +0.96 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.03
27 2025 1593 104.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.05 2018 1798 139.6 +3.00 +0.36 1.076 51.1% -18 -100 -125 58.3% +0.55 8–4 (67%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.04
28 2026 1722 113.8 -0.29 +0.66 1.081 51.7% -36 +40 — 52.9% +0.18 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.33 2019 1901 146.2 +3.96 +1.65 1.124 52.4% -93 +30 -139 58.5% +0.79 15–3 (83%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.27
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1805 132.1 +1.70 -1.09 1.032 50.6% -35 +79 — 56.7% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 7–3 (70%) — +1.15
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1657 123.5 +1.00 -2.75 0.932 48.5% -33 +198 +99 43.7% -0.22 7–8 (47%) 4–8 (33%) — +2.13
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1796 134.2 +2.70 -0.72 1.026 50.4% -88 +143 -60 56.3% +0.31 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) — +0.20
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1807 141.5 +3.00 -1.92 0.994 49.7% -62 +90 +3 47.1% -0.20 8–5 (62%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.59
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1636 121.5 +0.25 -3.87 0.883 47.5% -6 +131 +180 35.4% -0.94 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1607 111.0 -0.30 -0.75 0.832 45.5% -40 +116 — 47.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.57
Career — 1804 125.4 -1.42 +0.08 0.958 49.2% -86 +153 -14 46.9% -0.34 33–32 (51%) 27–16 (63%) 106.1 +0.87 — 1938 136.0 +1.65 -1.36 0.980 49.5% -28 +38 -14 48.7% -0.08 86–63 (58%) 58–54 (52%) 109.3 +0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.