H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Tamara Zidansek vs Renata Zarazua H2H: 1-1
Tamara Zidansek and Renata Zarazua are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamara Zidansek won the 2021 Monterrey third round 7-6(8) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 28
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 28
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2021* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Tamara Zidansek | 7-6(8) 6-3 | Renata Zarazua | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2020 | Acapulco | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Renata Zarazua | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Zidansek | #148 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,800 | 83 | 92 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Renata Zarazua | #83 | #51 | 1,063 | 1,746 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Renata Zarazua | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #257 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #263 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #135 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #368 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #104 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #148 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #83 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |