H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Zarina Diyas holds a 1–0 lead over Tamara Zidansek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zarina Diyas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zarina Diyas won the 2021 Australian Open first round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zarina Diyas | 6-2 7-5 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data | Feb 10, 2021* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Zarina Diyas | 6-1 6-4 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data | Aug 19, 2018 | Q3 | New Haven | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamara Zidansek | #146 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,803 | 80 | 91 | 46.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,756 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Zarina Diyas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #65 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #77 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2026 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #146 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Zarina Diyas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 21 | 2019 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2015 | 11 | 17 | 28 | 39.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 22 | 2020 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2021 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2017 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 2022 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2018 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2023 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2024 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 28 | 2026 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 34 | 51 | 85 | 40.0% | 42 | 33 | 75 | 56.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | 68 | 85 | 153 | 44.4% | 19 | 30 | 49 | 38.8% | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 164/170 of Tamara Zidansek's and 217/227 of Zarina Diyas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Zarina Diyas | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2/3 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 53.3% | 69.6% | 41.1% | 60.7% | 64.6% | 56.3% | 58.9% |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6/6 | 1.8 | 5.8 | 57.9% | 62.6% | 42.3% | 41.2% | 52.3% | 53.9% | 40.8% |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5/5 | 2.6 | 4.2 | 61.8% | 61.5% | 40.9% | 48.2% | 59.0% | 54.1% | 40.1% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 7.5 | 42.5% | 60.7% | 29.5% | 23.6% | 45.0% | 41.7% | 43.1% |
| 19 | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 68.3% | 46.5% | 55.0% | 50.0% | 75.0% | 49.2% | 38.9% | 2013 | 2/2 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 68.2% | 67.7% | 55.4% | 61.1% | 72.7% | 64.6% | 35.8% |
| 20 | 2018 | 14/14 | 0.6 | 3.5 | 65.4% | 57.7% | 42.3% | 44.7% | 51.2% | 52.5% | 48.6% | 2014 | 32/34 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 68.2% | 58.4% | 47.3% | 49.4% | 51.1% | 55.1% | 45.8% |
| 21 | 2019 | 33/34 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 68.5% | 58.2% | 42.0% | 53.9% | 44.6% | 53.1% | 42.8% | 2015 | 41/47 | 1.2 | 3.3 | 71.2% | 57.9% | 47.0% | 48.3% | 51.6% | 54.7% | 44.1% |
| 22 | 2020 | 15/15 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 68.3% | 59.5% | 47.5% | 55.0% | 48.5% | 55.6% | 43.3% | 2016 | 20/20 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 70.3% | 60.5% | 41.6% | 48.5% | 49.8% | 54.9% | 43.9% |
| 23 | 2021 | 41/43 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 64.9% | 62.8% | 45.6% | 49.4% | 50.9% | 56.7% | 45.0% | 2017 | 11/11 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 68.1% | 64.5% | 46.2% | 53.5% | 57.0% | 58.7% | 45.1% |
| 24 | 2022 | 30/32 | 1.3 | 3.6 | 63.1% | 61.5% | 42.8% | 49.8% | 48.5% | 54.3% | 41.4% | 2018 | 32/32 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 67.3% | 61.4% | 48.3% | 52.6% | 44.3% | 56.7% | 42.8% |
| 25 | 2023 | 14/14 | 0.5 | 3.7 | 68.0% | 54.9% | 43.2% | 53.3% | 54.1% | 51.1% | 46.1% | 2019 | 20/20 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 69.6% | 59.4% | 44.8% | 45.3% | 36.7% | 55.0% | 42.1% |
| 26 | 2024 | 10/10 | 0.4 | 4.5 | 63.5% | 57.8% | 38.8% | 46.4% | 36.2% | 51.2% | 40.2% | 2020 | 11/11 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 74.3% | 57.0% | 47.6% | 53.8% | 48.6% | 54.4% | 44.2% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 29/30 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 67.2% | 60.0% | 42.6% | 48.1% | 46.7% | 54.3% | 41.3% |
| 28 | 2026 | 6/7 | 1.7 | 4.7 | 59.6% | 64.0% | 44.6% | 51.1% | 61.9% | 55.8% | 47.8% | 2022 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 70.2% | 56.2% | 67.7% | 66.7% | 20.0% | 59.6% | 33.6% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 70.9% | 46.7% | 31.4% | 45.5% | 38.8% | 42.6% | 40.0% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 68.3% | 61.0% | 31.6% | 55.6% | 20.0% | 51.7% | 36.4% |
| Career | — | 164/171 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 65.7% | 59.9% | 43.7% | 50.7% | 48.9% | 54.2% | 43.9% | — | 217/227 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 68.4% | 59.8% | 45.4% | 49.3% | 48.4% | 55.1% | 43.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tamara Zidansek | Zarina Diyas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1528 | 105.5 | +0.98 | +1.13 | 1.348 | 57.6% | — | +48 | — | 66.7% | +1.00 | — | — | — | +0.06 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1539 | 114.4 | +0.14 | -1.62 | 0.883 | 47.6% | +19 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.8 | -0.06 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1505 | 103.6 | -1.72 | -1.18 | 0.875 | 47.5% | +17 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.08 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.16 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1477 | 95.3 | -2.37 | -3.62 | 0.739 | 42.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.11 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1484 | 98.5 | -0.11 | -0.64 | 0.766 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.15 | 2013 | 1478 | 100.3 | -1.99 | -0.40 | 1.012 | 50.7% | — | — | — | 40.0% | +0.60 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | +0.31 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1632 | 116.1 | -1.96 | +2.38 | 1.024 | 50.4% | -117 | +98 | — | 55.2% | +0.24 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.28 | 2014 | 1683 | 130.0 | -0.83 | +1.87 | 1.021 | 50.5% | -29 | -121 | -28 | 57.5% | +0.52 | 7–2 (78%) | 7–4 (64%) | 111.0 | +0.75 |
| 21 | 2019 | 1642 | 115.3 | -2.75 | -0.57 | 0.912 | 48.3% | -135 | +147 | -8 | 43.4% | -0.60 | 9–8 (53%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.4 | -0.17 | 2015 | 1561 | 125.0 | -2.62 | +2.02 | 0.975 | 49.5% | -15 | -26 | +133 | 47.0% | -0.32 | 3–9 (25%) | 4–5 (44%) | 91.8 | +1.00 |
| 22 | 2020 | 1613 | 128.8 | -0.74 | +0.40 | 0.974 | 49.8% | -65 | +134 | — | 47.2% | -0.06 | 1–5 (17%) | 3–2 (60%) | 96.1 | -0.44 | 2016 | 1553 | 119.4 | -0.44 | +0.63 | 0.974 | 49.5% | +1 | -18 | — | 42.6% | -0.34 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–3 (25%) | 98.7 | +0.38 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1727 | 132.9 | +0.46 | +0.75 | 1.038 | 50.9% | -162 | +227 | — | 54.1% | +0.16 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–2 (78%) | 108.2 | +0.90 | 2017 | 1665 | 121.5 | +1.12 | +0.16 | 1.091 | 52.1% | +6 | — | +15 | 57.7% | +0.73 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–3 (25%) | 102.1 | +0.69 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1596 | 120.1 | -1.76 | -0.99 | 0.907 | 47.9% | +16 | +119 | -18 | 41.7% | -0.61 | 6–6 (50%) | 6–6 (50%) | 99.0 | +1.49 | 2018 | 1718 | 138.2 | -0.01 | -0.24 | 0.989 | 49.8% | +12 | -125 | — | 44.9% | -0.07 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.3 | -2.35 |
| 25 | 2023 | 1678 | 119.9 | -2.90 | +0.63 | 0.942 | 48.6% | -80 | +129 | — | 48.5% | -0.64 | 1–4 (20%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.0 | -0.10 | 2019 | 1704 | 128.4 | -1.13 | -1.09 | 0.937 | 48.5% | +30 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.58 | 0–5 (0%) | 0–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 26 | 2024 | 1638 | 109.0 | -2.73 | -2.13 | 0.825 | 45.6% | -61 | +156 | — | 36.0% | -1.32 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–0 | — | +0.29 | 2020 | 1660 | 115.9 | -0.51 | +0.34 | 0.969 | 49.6% | +68 | -136 | — | 44.8% | -0.24 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.0 | -0.43 |
| 27 | 2025 | 1593 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.05 | 2021 | 1688 | 125.7 | -1.93 | -1.44 | 0.902 | 47.7% | +47 | -117 | -89 | 43.8% | -0.62 | 6–2 (75%) | 2–1 (67%) | 105.9 | -1.46 |
| 28 | 2026 | 1696 | 113.2 | -0.32 | +0.55 | 1.081 | 51.7% | -12 | +34 | — | 52.9% | +0.18 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.34 | 2022 | 1681 | 107.4 | -0.79 | +5.23 | 0.833 | 45.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.23 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1631 | 100.1 | -0.16 | -2.90 | 0.697 | 41.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1549 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1546 | 107.0 | -0.57 | -1.69 | 0.752 | 43.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.12 |
| Career | — | 1804 | 125.4 | -1.42 | +0.07 | 0.958 | 49.2% | -86 | +153 | -14 | 46.9% | -0.34 | 33–32 (51%) | 27–16 (63%) | 106.1 | +0.86 | — | 1756 | 131.4 | -1.07 | +0.30 | 0.966 | 49.3% | +8 | -81 | +46 | 46.2% | -0.25 | 32–36 (47%) | 22–29 (43%) | 97.4 | -0.47 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 11, 2021 | H2H |
| Anastasia Potapova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 13, 2025 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 12, 2019 | H2H |
| Anna Kalinskaya | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 14, 2022 | H2H |
| Petra Martic | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 12, 2022 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Mchale | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 15, 2021 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 11, 2021 | H2H |
| Nao Hibino | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 8, 2021 | H2H |
| Kristina Mladenovic | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 25, 2021 | H2H |
| Camila Giorgi | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 16, 2021 | H2H |