H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tanya Harford vs Leslie Allen H2H: 0-1
Leslie Allen holds a 1–0 lead over Tanya Harford in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leslie Allen leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leslie Allen won the 1982 Birmingham second round 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 67
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 69
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 1982* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Leslie Allen | 6-1 7-6 | Tanya Harford | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanya Harford | — | — | — | 1,786 | 50 | 71 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leslie Allen | — | — | — | 1,911 | 87 | 121 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tanya Harford | Leslie Allen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1979 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 27–23 | 54.0% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |