H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tanya Harford vs Marita Redondo H2H: 2-0
Tanya Harford holds a 2–0 lead over Marita Redondo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tanya Harford leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tanya Harford won the 1980 Eastbourne second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 67
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 70
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1980* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Tanya Harford | 6-2 6-3 | Marita Redondo | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1979* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tanya Harford | 7-6 6-1 | Marita Redondo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanya Harford | — | — | — | 1,786 | 50 | 71 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marita Redondo | — | — | — | 1,905 | 136 | 118 | 53.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tanya Harford | Marita Redondo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 15 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 24–4 | 85.7% | — | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 17 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 29–16 | 64.4% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | 1977 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1979 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1981 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 19–17 | 52.8% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 8 |