H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Tathiana Garbin holds a 1–0 lead over Katie Obrien in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2006 Wimbledon first round 2-6 7-6(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | 2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | Katie Obrien | Match data | Jun 28, 2006* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,726 | 168 | 209 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Katie Obrien | #782 | #84 | 769 | 1,514 | 9 | 34 | 20.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tathiana Garbin | Katie Obrien | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #127 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #159 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #88 | 1,390 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #58 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #179 | 1,370 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,365 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Tathiana Garbin | Katie Obrien | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1998 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 19 | 9 | 28 | 67.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2006 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2007 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 70 | 100 | 170 | 41.2% | 92 | 90 | 182 | 50.5% | 3 | 13 | 16 | 18.8% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | Career | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 3 | 15 | 18 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/248 of Tathiana Garbin's and 31/42 of Katie Obrien's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Tathiana Garbin | Katie Obrien | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2003 | 5/29 | 3.4 | 4.4 | 53.6% | 65.0% | 41.0% | 38.8% | 27.4% | 54.0% | 42.0% | 2005 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 51.2% | 63.6% | 47.6% | 0.0% | — | 55.8% | 20.0% |
| 2004 | 6/31 | 2.5 | 4.3 | 55.7% | 66.8% | 48.1% | 48.7% | 54.3% | 58.8% | 47.4% | 2006 | 2/3 | 1.5 | 6.0 | 58.1% | 57.7% | 42.1% | 37.9% | 62.5% | 51.1% | 42.8% |
| 2005 | 4/32 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 61.4% | 59.3% | 46.1% | 56.8% | 43.1% | 54.3% | 41.9% | 2007 | 4/7 | 2.3 | 5.3 | 55.7% | 62.5% | 36.7% | 44.9% | 36.4% | 51.4% | 42.2% |
| 2006 | 13/30 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 59.3% | 57.9% | 42.6% | 47.5% | 50.7% | 51.9% | 42.5% | 2008 | 6/10 | 1.5 | 6.7 | 54.5% | 62.6% | 43.3% | 54.5% | 42.0% | 53.7% | 42.6% |
| 2007 | 25/36 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 63.8% | 59.2% | 45.7% | 47.8% | 43.4% | 54.4% | 44.5% | 2009 | 9/10 | 1.2 | 6.6 | 59.0% | 54.7% | 35.8% | 45.2% | 44.2% | 46.9% | 39.4% |
| 2008 | 29/34 | 1.8 | 3.2 | 60.8% | 59.0% | 43.8% | 47.8% | 44.7% | 52.8% | 42.5% | 2010 | 8/10 | 1.6 | 6.3 | 59.5% | 54.8% | 39.7% | 41.7% | 33.7% | 49.0% | 37.8% |
| 2009 | 23/29 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 62.1% | 59.4% | 43.7% | 56.0% | 51.1% | 53.5% | 45.1% | 2011 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 62.9% | 46.2% | 30.4% | 41.7% | 60.0% | 40.3% | 37.5% |
| 2010 | 22/26 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 62.9% | 56.2% | 42.1% | 50.0% | 38.2% | 51.0% | 39.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 54.3% | 31.6% | 18.8% | 14.3% | 0.0% | 25.7% | 23.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 128/377 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 61.3% | 58.9% | 43.7% | 49.3% | 44.5% | 53.0% | 42.9% | Career | 31/43 | 1.5 | 6.2 | 57.6% | 57.5% | 39.0% | 44.0% | 40.3% | 49.7% | 39.5% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Tathiana Garbin | Katie Obrien | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1998 | 1476 | 99.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | 33.3% | -1.50 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.11 | 2004 | 1492 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.06 |
| 1999 | 1468 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +69 | +4 | — | 40.0% | -0.57 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.8 | +1.10 | 2005 | 1492 | 103.3 | +4.63 | +2.47 | 0.453 | 37.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.29 |
| 2000 | 1619 | 130.4 | — | — | — | — | -93 | +74 | — | 50.5% | +0.20 | 9–4 (69%) | 6–6 (50%) | 106.4 | -0.40 | 2006 | 1462 | 94.0 | -0.38 | +0.43 | 0.876 | 47.0% | — | — | +15 | 25.0% | -1.50 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.02 |
| 2001 | 1575 | 127.1 | — | — | — | — | -22 | +73 | — | 46.3% | -0.06 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.7 | +0.37 | 2007 | 1502 | 98.4 | -1.08 | -1.93 | 0.868 | 46.8% | +35 | — | +18 | 53.3% | -0.33 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.89 |
| 2002 | 1600 | 121.8 | — | — | — | — | -44 | +115 | — | 51.3% | -0.01 | 5–5 (50%) | 2–3 (40%) | 101.1 | +0.83 | 2008 | 1451 | 98.3 | -1.41 | -1.77 | 0.920 | 48.4% | +67 | — | +20 | 30.8% | -1.19 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.44 |
| 2003 | 1557 | 111.2 | -0.57 | -0.84 | 0.912 | 47.5% | -9 | +64 | — | 45.5% | -0.44 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.4 | +0.92 | 2009 | 1391 | 89.7 | -5.01 | -2.96 | 0.742 | 43.3% | +96 | +66 | — | 21.7% | -2.04 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +0.39 |
| 2004 | 1547 | 122.1 | +1.14 | +0.66 | 1.149 | 53.5% | +2 | +76 | — | 42.9% | -0.27 | 2–10 (17%) | 3–7 (30%) | 88.3 | -0.03 | 2010 | 1371 | 97.5 | -2.84 | -3.79 | 0.741 | 43.8% | +103 | +65 | — | 29.2% | -1.67 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | +0.42 |
| 2005 | 1559 | 119.9 | -0.38 | -1.30 | 0.916 | 48.0% | -30 | +111 | — | 43.5% | -0.46 | 3–4 (43%) | 5–5 (50%) | 98.7 | +0.08 | 2011 | 1366 | 99.1 | -2.49 | -4.08 | 0.628 | 39.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| 2006 | 1628 | 120.2 | -2.20 | -1.76 | 0.884 | 47.4% | -84 | +99 | — | 51.4% | -0.03 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–2 (67%) | 100.7 | +0.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 1659 | 123.9 | -0.97 | -0.08 | 0.977 | 49.1% | -68 | +117 | -189 | 54.8% | +0.26 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–1 (75%) | 105.3 | +2.93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 1564 | 113.6 | -2.43 | -1.04 | 0.900 | 47.7% | +44 | +64 | — | 44.9% | -0.54 | 5–7 (42%) | 3–1 (75%) | 98.8 | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1607 | 121.1 | -1.22 | +0.36 | 0.971 | 49.5% | -29 | +75 | — | 50.0% | -0.10 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–2 (50%) | 98.0 | -0.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1580 | 121.0 | -2.83 | -2.13 | 0.801 | 45.3% | +22 | +32 | — | 33.3% | -1.42 | 6–2 (75%) | 3–2 (60%) | 106.1 | -1.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1573 | 96.6 | +1.82 | +1.60 | 0.317 | 24.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -6.00 | — | — | — | -0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1726 | 125.4 | -1.64 | -0.76 | 0.912 | 48.0% | -23 | +78 | -189 | 46.5% | -0.27 | 52–60 (46%) | 41–35 (54%) | 102.2 | +1.01 | Career | 1514 | 93.8 | -2.56 | -2.45 | 0.785 | 44.8% | +80 | +66 | +18 | 29.4% | -1.51 | 4–12 (25%) | 5–2 (71%) | 95.3 | +4.19 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 25, 2009 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 4, 2010 | H2H |
| Marion Bartoli | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jan 19, 2011 | H2H |
| Flavia Pennetta | 2 | 4 | 6 | Feb 13, 2010 | H2H |
| Agnes Szavay | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jul 10, 2009 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alla Kudryavtseva | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 17, 2009 | H2H |
| Monica Niculescu | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 16, 2009 | H2H |
| Olga Govortsova | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 26, 2009 | H2H |
| Kimiko Date | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 22, 2011 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Ivanova | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 23, 2010 | H2H |