H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Tathiana Garbin vs Katie Obrien H2H: 1-0
Tathiana Garbin holds a 1–0 lead over Katie Obrien in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2006 Wimbledon first round 2-6 7-6(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Tathiana Garbin | 2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | Katie Obrien | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Katie Obrien | #782 | #84 | 769 | 1,514 | 9 | 34 | 20.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tathiana Garbin | Katie Obrien | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #127 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #159 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #88 | 1,391 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #179 | 1,371 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,366 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |