H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Tiantian Sun holds a 2–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tiantian Sun leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tiantian Sun won the 2004 Wimbledon round of 128 2-6 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiantian Sun | 2-6 6-0 6-2 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data | Jun 23, 2004* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Tiantian Sun | 7-5 2-3 (ret.) | Tathiana Garbin | Match data | Sep 18, 2003* | R32 | Shanghai | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,726 | 168 | 209 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tiantian Sun | #819 | #77 | 395 | 1,649 | 27 | 54 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tathiana Garbin | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #126 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #105 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #230 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #58 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Tathiana Garbin | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1998 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 19 | 9 | 28 | 67.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2004 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2005 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 70 | 100 | 170 | 41.2% | 92 | 90 | 182 | 50.5% | 3 | 13 | 16 | 18.8% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | Career | 22 | 41 | 63 | 34.9% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/248 of Tathiana Garbin's and 28/56 of Tiantian Sun's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Tathiana Garbin | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2003 | 5/29 | 3.4 | 4.4 | 53.6% | 65.0% | 41.0% | 38.8% | 27.4% | 54.0% | 42.0% | 2003 | 1/9 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 59.4% | 60.5% | 30.8% | 28.6% | 28.6% | 48.4% | 40.0% |
| 2004 | 6/31 | 2.5 | 4.3 | 55.7% | 66.8% | 48.1% | 48.7% | 54.3% | 58.8% | 47.4% | 2006 | 9/24 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 67.2% | 58.1% | 44.5% | 53.0% | 49.3% | 53.8% | 37.5% |
| 2005 | 4/32 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 61.4% | 59.3% | 46.1% | 56.8% | 43.1% | 54.3% | 41.9% | 2007 | 14/18 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 65.0% | 55.8% | 43.0% | 44.6% | 35.3% | 51.3% | 40.4% |
| 2006 | 13/30 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 59.3% | 57.9% | 42.6% | 47.5% | 50.7% | 51.9% | 42.5% | 2008 | 4/5 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 65.6% | 55.4% | 41.8% | 51.8% | 30.6% | 51.0% | 36.8% |
| 2007 | 25/36 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 63.8% | 59.2% | 45.7% | 47.8% | 43.4% | 54.4% | 44.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 29/34 | 1.8 | 3.2 | 60.8% | 59.0% | 43.8% | 47.8% | 44.7% | 52.8% | 42.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 23/29 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 62.1% | 59.4% | 43.7% | 56.0% | 51.1% | 53.5% | 45.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 22/26 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 62.9% | 56.2% | 42.1% | 50.0% | 38.2% | 51.0% | 39.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 54.3% | 31.6% | 18.8% | 14.3% | 0.0% | 25.7% | 23.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 128/377 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 61.3% | 58.9% | 43.7% | 49.3% | 44.5% | 53.0% | 42.9% | Career | 28/81 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 65.6% | 56.6% | 42.8% | 47.8% | 38.8% | 52.0% | 38.9% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Tathiana Garbin | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1998 | 1476 | 99.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | 33.3% | -1.50 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.11 | 2002 | 1493 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.19 |
| 1999 | 1468 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +69 | +4 | — | 40.0% | -0.57 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.8 | +1.10 | 2003 | 1451 | 101.0 | -0.20 | -1.27 | 0.776 | 43.9% | +17 | — | — | 22.2% | -1.67 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.54 |
| 2000 | 1619 | 130.4 | — | — | — | — | -93 | +74 | — | 50.5% | +0.20 | 9–4 (69%) | 6–6 (50%) | 106.4 | -0.40 | 2004 | 1430 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | -34 | +118 | — | 24.0% | -1.68 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 2001 | 1575 | 127.1 | — | — | — | — | -22 | +73 | — | 46.3% | -0.06 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.7 | +0.37 | 2005 | 1520 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | — | 57.7% | +0.69 | 1–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.62 |
| 2002 | 1600 | 121.8 | — | — | — | — | -44 | +115 | — | 51.3% | -0.01 | 5–5 (50%) | 2–3 (40%) | 101.1 | +0.83 | 2006 | 1629 | 131.4 | -1.14 | -2.98 | 0.811 | 45.8% | -16 | — | — | 52.7% | -0.04 | 2–5 (29%) | — | — | -0.16 |
| 2003 | 1557 | 111.2 | -0.57 | -0.84 | 0.912 | 47.5% | -9 | +64 | — | 45.5% | -0.44 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.4 | +0.92 | 2007 | 1505 | 100.0 | -2.48 | -2.77 | 0.830 | 45.9% | +49 | -23 | — | 20.5% | -2.13 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.7 | -1.14 |
| 2004 | 1547 | 122.1 | +1.14 | +0.66 | 1.149 | 53.5% | +2 | +76 | — | 42.9% | -0.27 | 2–10 (17%) | 3–7 (30%) | 88.3 | -0.03 | 2008 | 1494 | 101.6 | -1.21 | -2.08 | 0.750 | 43.9% | +30 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.62 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.7 | +0.02 |
| 2005 | 1559 | 119.9 | -0.38 | -1.30 | 0.916 | 48.0% | -30 | +111 | — | 43.5% | -0.46 | 3–4 (43%) | 5–5 (50%) | 98.7 | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1628 | 120.2 | -2.20 | -1.76 | 0.884 | 47.4% | -84 | +99 | — | 51.4% | -0.03 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–2 (67%) | 100.7 | +0.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 1659 | 123.9 | -0.97 | -0.08 | 0.977 | 49.1% | -68 | +117 | -189 | 54.8% | +0.26 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–1 (75%) | 105.3 | +2.93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 1564 | 113.6 | -2.43 | -1.04 | 0.900 | 47.7% | +44 | +64 | — | 44.9% | -0.54 | 5–7 (42%) | 3–1 (75%) | 98.8 | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1607 | 121.1 | -1.22 | +0.36 | 0.971 | 49.5% | -29 | +75 | — | 50.0% | -0.10 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–2 (50%) | 98.0 | -0.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1580 | 121.0 | -2.83 | -2.13 | 0.801 | 45.3% | +22 | +32 | — | 33.3% | -1.42 | 6–2 (75%) | 3–2 (60%) | 106.1 | -1.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1573 | 96.6 | +1.82 | +1.60 | 0.317 | 24.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -6.00 | — | — | — | -0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1726 | 125.4 | -1.64 | -0.76 | 0.912 | 48.0% | -23 | +78 | -189 | 46.5% | -0.27 | 52–60 (46%) | 41–35 (54%) | 102.2 | +1.01 | Career | 1650 | 117.9 | -1.79 | -2.69 | 0.810 | 45.5% | 0 | +30 | — | 37.4% | -0.93 | 6–15 (29%) | 11–8 (58%) | 98.4 | -0.41 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 25, 2009 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 4, 2010 | H2H |
| Marion Bartoli | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jan 19, 2011 | H2H |
| Flavia Pennetta | 2 | 4 | 6 | Feb 13, 2010 | H2H |
| Agnes Szavay | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jul 10, 2009 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginie Razzano | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 20, 2008 | H2H |
| Gisela Dulko | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 8, 2007 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 17, 2008 | H2H |
| Anastasia Rodionova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 6, 2008 | H2H |
| Martina Hingis | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 20, 2007 | H2H |