H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Golovin vs Emilie Loit H2H: 1-0

Tatiana Golovin holds a 1–0 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatiana Golovin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tatiana Golovin won the 2004 Birmingham semifinal 6-3 5-7 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Golovin
FRA Age 38 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatiana Golovin #71 6-3 5-7 7-5 Emilie Loit #36 Match data Jun 12, 2004* SF Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatiana Golovin #1,128 #12 1,882 2,014 131 80 62.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Golovin Emilie Loit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2003 1–4 20.0% #358 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2004 27–15 64.3% #27 1,748 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2005 33–22 60.0% #24 1,770 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2006 25–18 58.1% #22 1,831 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0
19 2007 43–17 71.7% #13 1,982 0 2 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0
20 2008 2–4 33.3% #254 1,892 0 2 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatiana Golovin Emilie Loit
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2004 15 9 24 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2005 21 15 36 58.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 21 14 35 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2007 32 14 46 69.6% 8 1 9 88.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
Career — 92 57 149 61.7% 15 12 27 55.6% 13 6 19 68.4% 11 5 16 68.8% — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatiana Golovin Emilie Loit
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2003 1480 104.4 -1.25 -1.00 0.643 41.4% +46 — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2004 1749 139.2 -0.81 +2.08 1.016 50.5% -50 -271 +70 58.1% +0.63 6–6 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 98.9 -1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2005 1770 139.7 +1.57 +1.88 1.144 53.0% -21 -181 +35 60.2% +0.68 9–13 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 98.5 -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2006 1831 151.9 +1.85 +1.96 1.079 51.7% +15 — — 59.4% +0.92 7–7 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 98.9 +0.88 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22
19 2007 1983 161.9 +4.08 +4.22 1.198 53.9% -19 -194 — 70.6% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 6–1 (86%) 106.1 -0.34 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
20 2008 1893 111.5 +0.56 +1.03 1.040 50.9% -2 — — 40.0% -0.20 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.16 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07
31 2019 1865 95.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2014 151.5 +2.59 +2.99 1.129 52.7% -15 -202 +58 61.1% +0.89 32–37 (46%) 23–23 (50%) 98.8 -0.61 — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.