H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tatiana Golovin vs Emilie Loit H2H: 1-0
Tatiana Golovin holds a 1–0 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatiana Golovin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tatiana Golovin won the 2004 Birmingham semifinal 6-3 5-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2004* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Tatiana Golovin | 6-3 5-7 7-5 | Emilie Loit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Golovin | #1,128 | #12 | 1,882 | 2,012 | 131 | 80 | 62.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Emilie Loit | #161 | #27 | 1,016 | 1,780 | 162 | 180 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Golovin | Emilie Loit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #358 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2004 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #13 | 1,981 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #254 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #101 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #45 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,513 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 |