Tatjana Maria
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 1 | 5 | 6 | May 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Anna Bondar | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jan 14, 2026 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 29, 2026 | H2H |
| Madison Keys | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 27, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 9, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 3–1 lead over Tatjana Maria in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatjana Maria won the 2018 US Open first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatjana Maria | 6-3 6-3 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data | Aug 29, 2018* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 6-2 | Tatjana Maria | Match data | Oct 13, 2016* | R32 | Tianjin | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-1 6-0 | Tatjana Maria | Match data | Jan 20, 2010* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-2 6-1 | Tatjana Maria | Match data | Aug 2, 2007* | R32 | Stockholm | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatjana Maria | #83 | #36 | 1,320 | 1,822 | 164 | 261 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,103 | 513 | 241 | 68.0% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 20 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatjana Maria | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2007 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #89 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2008 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #223 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2010 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,980 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #268 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,877 | 0 | 14 |
| 26 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,961 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 2015 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #3 | 1,980 | 0 | 20 |
| 28 | 2016 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #115 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,823 | 0 | 20 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #74 | 1,752 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #72 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #68 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #54 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #86 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #45 | 1,638 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tatjana Maria | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 2007 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 30 | 14 | 44 | 68.2% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 28 | 16 | 44 | 63.6% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 21 | 2009 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 25 | 12 | 37 | 67.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 36 | 12 | 48 | 75.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 41 | 13 | 54 | 75.9% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 46 | 15 | 61 | 75.4% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 31 | 16 | 47 | 66.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 36 | 16 | 52 | 69.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 43 | 13 | 56 | 76.8% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20 | 14 | 34 | 58.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 4 | 17 | 21 | 19.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 14 | 16 | 30 | 46.7% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 76 | 152 | 228 | 33.3% | 52 | 79 | 131 | 39.7% | 36 | 30 | 66 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | — | 370 | 166 | 536 | 69.0% | 75 | 45 | 120 | 62.5% | 66 | 28 | 94 | 70.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 320/357 of Tatjana Maria's and 651/755 of Agnieszka Radwanska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tatjana Maria | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10/19 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 65.4% | 59.8% | 46.5% | 60.6% | 47.1% | 55.1% | 46.0% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 41/46 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 60.6% | 62.9% | 47.7% | 57.5% | 43.5% | 57.3% | 44.3% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 59/72 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 67.0% | 63.2% | 46.8% | 50.4% | 54.4% | 57.9% | 49.2% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 64/67 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 66.3% | 62.9% | 48.9% | 52.1% | 56.0% | 58.2% | 48.9% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 49/50 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 65.6% | 64.1% | 50.5% | 51.5% | 47.9% | 59.2% | 48.8% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 56/64 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 67.1% | 64.4% | 51.4% | 58.4% | 54.0% | 59.9% | 49.6% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 68/79 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 67.3% | 66.3% | 46.7% | 56.9% | 56.1% | 59.9% | 49.0% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 69/76 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 64.9% | 65.6% | 50.7% | 55.0% | 53.1% | 60.4% | 48.1% |
| 25 | 2013 | 2/7 | 3.5 | 6.0 | 58.2% | 51.5% | 38.5% | 58.6% | 33.3% | 45.9% | 32.1% | 2014 | 60/65 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 65.5% | 63.3% | 48.2% | 56.8% | 52.0% | 58.2% | 49.8% |
| 26 | 2014 | 5/5 | 6.4 | 4.2 | 50.8% | 62.2% | 39.2% | 46.8% | 53.3% | 51.2% | 41.2% | 2015 | 49/72 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 66.7% | 68.4% | 51.3% | 56.8% | 54.6% | 62.7% | 46.7% |
| 27 | 2015 | 23/26 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 54.7% | 68.0% | 50.1% | 58.5% | 46.8% | 59.8% | 39.4% | 2016 | 60/73 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 62.4% | 67.3% | 47.7% | 60.1% | 57.3% | 60.0% | 49.8% |
| 28 | 2016 | 18/19 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 60.4% | 59.2% | 45.0% | 47.9% | 47.3% | 53.6% | 38.9% | 2017 | 42/43 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 61.8% | 64.9% | 45.8% | 53.6% | 46.7% | 57.5% | 46.3% |
| 29 | 2017 | 30/31 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 56.2% | 69.6% | 44.9% | 57.7% | 48.4% | 58.7% | 42.3% | 2018 | 24/29 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 60.8% | 59.8% | 44.2% | 45.6% | 42.6% | 53.4% | 43.2% |
| 30 | 2018 | 34/35 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 56.2% | 63.7% | 43.5% | 50.8% | 47.7% | 54.5% | 38.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 31/32 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 54.1% | 63.3% | 42.7% | 48.7% | 43.2% | 54.0% | 39.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 7/7 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 60.9% | 53.6% | 39.4% | 47.2% | 30.6% | 47.8% | 39.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 27/29 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 53.3% | 71.0% | 49.3% | 55.7% | 50.1% | 60.8% | 43.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 48/49 | 3.9 | 2.9 | 55.1% | 65.7% | 44.8% | 49.5% | 56.1% | 56.5% | 44.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 39/41 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 54.9% | 60.2% | 41.7% | 45.7% | 40.6% | 52.2% | 40.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 15/33 | 4.7 | 2.9 | 57.3% | 59.9% | 42.1% | 43.5% | 43.4% | 52.1% | 41.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 41/43 | 4.3 | 2.3 | 60.0% | 67.0% | 44.1% | 53.1% | 50.2% | 57.7% | 42.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tatjana Maria | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1673 | 141.6 | +0.60 | +1.54 | 1.026 | 50.8% | -31 | -111 | +25 | 58.1% | +0.40 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.3 | -0.39 |
| 18 | 2006 | 1481 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.16 | 2007 | 1810 | 145.1 | +1.25 | +1.05 | 1.037 | 50.9% | -9 | -215 | -55 | 57.7% | +0.58 | 8–8 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 104.1 | -0.85 |
| 19 | 2007 | 1452 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | +12 | +66 | +133 | 26.7% | -1.40 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.16 | 2008 | 1914 | 152.0 | +2.51 | +4.81 | 1.167 | 53.4% | -49 | -105 | +11 | 66.0% | +1.18 | 14–7 (67%) | 7–7 (50%) | 104.2 | +0.97 |
| 20 | 2008 | 1424 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 17.6% | -2.06 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.49 | 2009 | 1913 | 151.3 | +2.63 | +4.78 | 1.172 | 53.5% | -27 | -59 | +42 | 62.8% | +0.99 | 11–9 (55%) | 4–10 (29%) | 92.8 | +1.49 |
| 21 | 2009 | 1493 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | -29 | +34 | — | 36.4% | -1.18 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–1 | — | -0.55 | 2010 | 1862 | 156.5 | +3.54 | +5.02 | 1.197 | 53.9% | +37 | -47 | +77 | 66.0% | +1.38 | 2–8 (20%) | 4–3 (57%) | 91.3 | +2.07 |
| 22 | 2010 | 1497 | 109.5 | — | — | — | — | -12 | -1 | — | 35.7% | -1.07 | 4–4 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | 100.3 | -0.82 | 2011 | 1980 | 161.2 | +4.42 | +6.19 | 1.237 | 54.8% | +22 | -148 | -85 | 67.3% | +1.27 | 12–11 (52%) | 6–9 (40%) | 94.9 | +2.26 |
| 23 | 2011 | 1469 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.16 | 2012 | 1989 | 163.4 | +4.85 | +5.61 | 1.223 | 54.4% | +44 | -42 | -81 | 72.4% | +1.53 | 11–7 (61%) | 5–3 (63%) | 99.8 | +0.14 |
| 24 | 2012 | 1473 | 101.7 | — | — | — | — | -16 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.67 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.36 | 2013 | 1966 | 161.1 | +5.04 | +4.68 | 1.217 | 54.2% | +44 | -43 | -7 | 70.9% | +1.54 | 10–5 (67%) | 12–5 (71%) | 103.6 | +1.71 |
| 25 | 2013 | 1438 | 94.6 | -2.28 | -2.31 | 0.593 | 40.1% | +20 | +16 | — | 20.0% | -2.40 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.01 | 2014 | 1877 | 160.3 | +2.22 | +5.84 | 1.190 | 53.9% | +20 | +68 | +42 | 63.6% | +1.24 | 8–7 (53%) | 7–5 (58%) | 99.1 | +1.73 |
| 26 | 2014 | 1447 | 95.9 | -2.52 | -1.88 | 0.844 | 46.7% | +20 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.09 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.29 | 2015 | 1962 | 156.6 | +4.09 | +5.26 | 1.249 | 54.7% | +2 | -94 | -3 | 67.3% | +1.52 | 9–13 (41%) | 3–6 (33%) | 90.4 | -0.24 |
| 27 | 2015 | 1479 | 110.7 | +0.60 | -1.33 | 0.980 | 49.7% | -7 | -43 | +112 | 43.1% | -0.31 | 1–5 (17%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.3 | +0.67 | 2016 | 1980 | 161.7 | +4.05 | +6.47 | 1.245 | 54.9% | +48 | -113 | -53 | 72.2% | +1.73 | 8–10 (44%) | 8–6 (57%) | 94.0 | +0.07 |
| 28 | 2016 | 1466 | 112.4 | -1.11 | -3.07 | 0.839 | 46.4% | -9 | -23 | — | 24.4% | -1.59 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 97.2 | +0.04 | 2017 | 1823 | 139.7 | +1.38 | +2.93 | 1.090 | 51.9% | +30 | +27 | +110 | 57.7% | +0.56 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–3 (63%) | 94.9 | +1.52 |
| 29 | 2017 | 1566 | 124.1 | +1.13 | -0.63 | 1.024 | 51.0% | -48 | -14 | -21 | 46.0% | -0.06 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–0 | — | +0.89 | 2018 | 1752 | 134.0 | -1.95 | +0.83 | 0.927 | 48.2% | +14 | — | +160 | 47.6% | -0.17 | 7–2 (78%) | 4–1 (80%) | 107.0 | -0.80 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1632 | 116.0 | -1.90 | -3.62 | 0.840 | 46.7% | -69 | -111 | +75 | 35.8% | -1.16 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–3 (50%) | 104.4 | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 1578 | 121.2 | -1.61 | -2.85 | 0.849 | 46.9% | +26 | -142 | +163 | 42.3% | -0.79 | 3–6 (33%) | 5–3 (63%) | 98.1 | -0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 1587 | 109.8 | -3.38 | -1.03 | 0.757 | 43.7% | +15 | — | — | 25.0% | -2.19 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 1511 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 1653 | 128.1 | +2.42 | +0.72 | 1.120 | 52.4% | -89 | -82 | +219 | 60.0% | +0.86 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–4 (43%) | 103.4 | +1.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 1705 | 130.4 | +0.14 | +0.47 | 1.013 | 50.4% | -13 | -95 | +119 | 50.0% | +0.10 | 6–10 (38%) | 5–6 (45%) | 94.6 | +1.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 1576 | 112.0 | -3.26 | -2.66 | 0.853 | 46.5% | +21 | -40 | +207 | 33.0% | -1.51 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–4 (56%) | 97.1 | +1.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 1638 | 121.0 | -2.97 | -1.00 | 0.857 | 46.5% | -65 | -154 | +320 | 44.7% | -0.55 | 4–6 (40%) | 9–8 (53%) | 99.6 | +0.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 1795 | 129.7 | +0.55 | -0.13 | 1.009 | 50.2% | -227 | -248 | +315 | 44.9% | -0.19 | 1–6 (14%) | 3–4 (43%) | 96.0 | +0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1822 | 123.0 | -0.64 | -1.31 | 0.932 | 48.7% | -36 | -65 | +192 | 40.4% | -0.69 | 44–69 (39%) | 44–49 (47%) | 97.2 | +0.95 | — | 2104 | 161.3 | +3.16 | +4.74 | 1.175 | 53.6% | +16 | -74 | +8 | 65.6% | +1.20 | 107–96 (53%) | 70–61 (53%) | 95.2 | +1.29 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 1 | 5 | 6 | May 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Anna Bondar | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jan 14, 2026 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 29, 2026 | H2H |
| Madison Keys | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 27, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Azarenka | 5 | 13 | 18 | Mar 27, 2018 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 6 | 11 | 17 | Aug 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 4 | 13 | 17 | Jul 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 6 | 8 | 14 | Aug 22, 2018 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 2 | 12 | 14 | Oct 25, 2015 | H2H |