H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tatjana Maria vs Ashleigh Barty H2H: 0-3

Ashleigh Barty holds a 3–0 lead over Tatjana Maria in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ashleigh Barty leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2019 Indian Wells Open second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatjana Maria
Germany Age 39 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Ashleigh Barty
AUS Age 30 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ashleigh Barty #12 6-4 6-4 Tatjana Maria #69 Match data Mar 9, 2019* R64 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Ashleigh Barty #18 4-6 6-3 6-2 Tatjana Maria #61 Match data Apr 5, 2018* R32 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Ashleigh Barty #88 4-6 6-3 6-0 Tatjana Maria #92 Match data Jun 15, 2017* R32 Nottingham Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatjana Maria #83 #36 1,320 1,822 164 261 38.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Ashleigh Barty #1 #1 10,185 2,180 197 72 73.2% 3 3 2 5 2 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatjana Maria Ashleigh Barty
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2012 0–4 0.0% #175 1,469 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2013 4–5 44.4% #190 1,519 0 0
18 2006 0–2 0.0% #136 1,481 0 0 2014 1–6 14.3% #223 1,510 0 0
19 2007 4–11 26.7% #89 1,452 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2008 1–7 12.5% #223 1,423 0 0 2016 2–1 66.7% #272 1,595 0 0
21 2009 6–9 40.0% #71 1,493 0 0 2017 30–14 68.2% #17 1,891 0 1
22 2010 8–16 33.3% #137 1,496 0 0 2018 42–19 68.9% #15 1,973 0 3
23 2011 0–2 0.0% #203 1,468 0 0 2019 52–12 81.2% #1 2,082 1 7
24 2012 2–3 40.0% #112 1,473 0 0 2020 12–3 80.0% #1 2,083 1 8
25 2013 1–6 14.3% #268 1,437 0 0 2021 43–8 84.3% #1 2,117 2 13
26 2014 2–3 40.0% #160 1,446 0 0 2022 11–0 100.0% #1 2,180 3 15
27 2015 10–16 38.5% #74 1,478 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2016 4–15 21.1% #115 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2017 14–17 45.2% #47 1,565 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2018 12–23 34.3% #72 1,632 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2019 12–20 37.5% #86 1,577 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2020 2–5 28.6% #109 1,586 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2022 17–11 60.7% #68 1,653 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2023 24–25 49.0% #54 1,704 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2024 13–27 32.5% #86 1,576 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2025 14–19 42.4% #45 1,638 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2026 18–24 42.9% #83 1,794 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatjana Maria Ashleigh Barty
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 22 9 31 71.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2010 4 8 12 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 25 11 36 69.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 10 3 13 76.9%
23 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 33 9 42 78.6% 11 2 13 84.6% 8 1 9 88.9%
24 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 22 4 26 84.6% 14 4 18 77.8% 7 0 7 100.0%
26 2014 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2022 11 0 11 100.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2015 3 6 9 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1 8 9 11.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 7 9 16 43.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 4 17 21 19.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 14 16 30 46.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 7 13 20 35.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 4 13 17 23.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 76 152 228 33.3% 52 79 131 39.7% 36 30 66 54.5% — 129 46 175 73.7% 35 17 52 67.3% 33 9 42 78.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 320/356 of Tatjana Maria's and 243/269 of Ashleigh Barty's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tatjana Maria Ashleigh Barty
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 4/4 2.8 5.3 58.7% 60.8% 32.7% 35.0% 43.3% 49.0% 32.0%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/9 3.5 2.7 54.3% 65.7% 50.2% 36.3% 44.9% 58.4% 37.5%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 4/7 3.0 3.8 57.5% 63.1% 50.5% 57.1% 56.5% 57.6% 32.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 3/3 6.7 3.7 65.2% 73.9% 47.4% 68.3% 35.5% 64.7% 43.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 41/44 5.0 2.9 60.9% 72.5% 50.3% 58.9% 51.7% 63.6% 44.1%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 58/61 4.9 2.9 58.4% 71.9% 53.7% 53.1% 47.3% 64.3% 42.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 54/64 6.5 3.2 57.5% 73.7% 52.1% 54.7% 47.4% 64.4% 45.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 14/15 5.6 1.9 60.7% 73.5% 49.9% 60.4% 53.0% 64.4% 44.0%
25 2013 2/7 3.5 6.0 58.2% 51.5% 38.5% 58.6% 33.3% 45.9% 32.1% 2021 48/51 6.7 3.3 58.8% 75.8% 49.4% 59.3% 48.7% 64.8% 46.0%
26 2014 5/5 6.4 4.2 50.8% 62.2% 39.2% 46.8% 53.3% 51.2% 41.2% 2022 11/11 7.0 1.7 60.3% 81.1% 58.6% 90.0% 60.2% 72.2% 48.2%
27 2015 23/26 3.2 2.9 54.7% 68.0% 50.1% 58.5% 46.8% 59.8% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 18/19 3.2 2.2 60.4% 59.2% 45.0% 47.9% 47.3% 53.6% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 30/31 3.2 2.2 56.2% 69.6% 44.9% 57.7% 48.4% 58.7% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 34/35 4.0 2.7 56.2% 63.7% 43.5% 50.8% 47.7% 54.5% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 31/32 3.4 2.7 54.1% 63.3% 42.7% 48.7% 43.2% 54.0% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 7/7 3.6 2.6 60.9% 53.6% 39.4% 47.2% 30.6% 47.8% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 27/29 3.9 3.5 53.3% 71.0% 49.3% 55.7% 50.1% 60.8% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 48/49 3.9 2.9 55.1% 65.7% 44.8% 49.5% 56.1% 56.5% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 39/41 3.4 2.9 54.9% 60.2% 41.7% 45.7% 40.6% 52.2% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 15/33 4.7 2.9 57.3% 59.9% 42.1% 43.5% 43.4% 52.1% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 41/42 4.3 2.3 60.0% 67.0% 44.1% 53.1% 50.2% 57.7% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 320/427 3.8 2.8 56.1% 64.7% 44.4% 51.1% 47.6% 55.8% 41.2% — 243/269 5.7 3.0 58.9% 73.2% 51.4% 57.3% 49.1% 64.2% 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatjana Maria Ashleigh Barty
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1469 97.5 -1.40 -1.92 0.627 41.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.26
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1519 110.4 +0.25 -1.62 0.902 47.5% +1 — — 47.6% -1.05 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.14
18 2006 1481 99.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16 2014 1510 114.8 +1.59 -1.59 0.772 46.2% +7 — — 23.1% -2.15 0–1 0–1 — -0.81
19 2007 1452 109.9 — — — — +12 +66 +133 26.7% -1.40 0–2 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1424 111.5 — — — — +28 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 0–1 — -0.49 2016 1595 108.1 -0.11 +1.91 1.241 53.2% — — +26 57.1% +1.57 1–0 0–2 — -0.09
21 2009 1493 111.4 — — — — -29 +34 — 36.4% -1.18 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -0.55 2017 1892 150.0 +6.11 +1.57 1.211 54.0% -27 -297 -172 61.4% +1.02 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 111.0 -1.16
22 2010 1497 109.5 — — — — -12 -1 — 35.7% -1.07 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.3 -0.82 2018 1973 151.5 +6.83 +0.72 1.194 53.1% -6 -281 -148 65.4% +1.08 10–3 (77%) 4–3 (57%) 108.4 -0.44
23 2011 1469 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.16 2019 2083 165.1 +6.89 +3.36 1.272 54.6% +1 -186 -124 71.9% +1.58 19–6 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 107.5 -1.06
24 2012 1473 101.7 — — — — -16 — — 41.7% -0.67 1–1 1–1 — +0.36 2020 2084 154.1 +5.09 +2.45 1.236 54.3% -5 — — 67.6% +1.59 5–1 (83%) 2–3 (40%) 100.7 -0.69
25 2013 1438 94.6 -2.28 -2.31 0.593 40.1% +20 +16 — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.01 2021 2118 162.9 +7.48 +3.74 1.306 55.3% +19 -82 +83 77.0% +1.89 14–3 (82%) 7–4 (64%) 110.2 -0.67
26 2014 1447 95.9 -2.52 -1.88 0.844 46.7% +20 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 1–1 — +0.29 2022 2181 159.7 +8.99 +4.21 1.735 59.8% +42 — — 95.7% +3.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.08
27 2015 1479 110.7 +0.60 -1.33 0.980 49.7% -7 -43 +112 43.1% -0.31 1–5 (17%) 4–2 (67%) 99.3 +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1466 112.4 -1.11 -3.07 0.839 46.4% -9 -23 — 24.4% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.2 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1566 124.1 +1.13 -0.63 1.024 51.0% -48 -14 -21 46.0% -0.06 0–5 (0%) 1–0 — +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 1632 116.0 -1.90 -3.62 0.840 46.7% -69 -111 +75 35.8% -1.16 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 104.4 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1578 121.2 -1.61 -2.85 0.849 46.9% +26 -142 +163 42.3% -0.79 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.1 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1587 109.8 -3.38 -1.03 0.757 43.7% +15 — — 25.0% -2.19 2–0 1–1 — -0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1511 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1653 128.1 +2.42 +0.72 1.120 52.4% -89 -82 +219 60.0% +0.86 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 103.4 +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1705 130.4 +0.14 +0.47 1.013 50.4% -13 -95 +119 50.0% +0.10 6–10 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 94.6 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1576 112.0 -3.26 -2.66 0.853 46.5% +21 -40 +207 33.0% -1.51 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) 97.1 +1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1638 120.9 -2.97 -1.00 0.857 46.5% -65 -154 +320 44.7% -0.55 4–6 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 99.6 +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1795 129.7 +0.56 -0.21 1.009 50.2% -226 -248 +314 44.9% -0.19 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 96.0 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1822 123.0 -0.64 -1.32 0.932 48.7% -35 -65 +192 40.4% -0.69 44–69 (39%) 44–49 (47%) 97.2 +0.96 — 2181 161.7 +6.38 +2.18 1.228 53.9% -1 -180 -96 67.3% +1.27 62–22 (74%) 29–22 (57%) 115.6 -2.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.