H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatjana Maria vs Shuai Zhang H2H: 1-0

Tatjana Maria holds a 1–0 lead over Shuai Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatjana Maria leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tatjana Maria won the 2023 Nottingham Open first round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatjana Maria
Germany Age 39 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Shuai Zhang
China Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatjana Maria #66 6-1 6-4 Shuai Zhang #31 Match data Jun 15, 2023* R32 Nottingham Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatjana Maria #83 #36 1,320 1,822 164 261 38.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Shuai Zhang #54 #22 1,905 1,857 232 294 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatjana Maria Shuai Zhang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% #203 1,495 0 0
18 2006 0–2 0.0% #136 1,481 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #149 1,464 0 0
19 2007 4–11 26.7% #89 1,452 0 0 2008 0–6 0.0% #235 1,412 0 0
20 2008 1–7 12.5% #223 1,423 0 0 2009 2–1 66.7% #154 1,467 0 0
21 2009 6–9 40.0% #71 1,493 0 0 2010 3–4 42.9% #90 1,492 0 0
22 2010 8–16 33.3% #137 1,496 0 0 2011 8–22 26.7% #126 1,445 0 0
23 2011 0–2 0.0% #203 1,468 0 0 2012 2–6 25.0% #127 1,457 0 0
24 2012 2–3 40.0% #112 1,473 0 0 2013 9–4 69.2% #52 1,598 0 1
25 2013 1–6 14.3% #268 1,437 0 0 2014 18–24 42.9% #61 1,600 0 1
26 2014 2–3 40.0% #160 1,446 0 0 2015 4–12 25.0% #139 1,518 0 1
27 2015 10–16 38.5% #74 1,478 0 0 2016 26–21 55.3% #23 1,774 0 1
28 2016 4–15 21.1% #115 1,466 0 0 2017 23–24 48.9% #36 1,774 0 2
29 2017 14–17 45.2% #47 1,565 0 0 2018 28–27 50.9% #40 1,726 0 2
30 2018 12–23 34.3% #72 1,632 0 1 2019 18–23 43.9% #40 1,681 0 2
31 2019 12–20 37.5% #86 1,577 0 1 2020 12–10 54.5% #35 1,733 0 2
32 2020 2–5 28.6% #109 1,586 0 1 2021 15–24 38.5% #60 1,631 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2022 34–26 56.7% #25 1,733 0 3
34 2022 17–11 60.7% #68 1,653 0 2 2023 4–18 18.2% #245 1,524 0 3
35 2023 24–25 49.0% #54 1,704 0 3 2024 5–12 29.4% #205 1,574 0 3
36 2024 13–27 32.5% #86 1,576 0 3 2025 10–7 58.8% #81 1,731 0 3
37 2025 14–19 42.4% #45 1,638 0 4 2026 11–19 36.7% #54 1,698 0 3
38 2026 18–24 42.9% #83 1,794 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatjana Maria Shuai Zhang
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2010 4 8 12 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 7 17 24 29.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2014 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 1 6 7 14.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2015 3 6 9 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 2016 24 15 39 61.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2016 1 8 9 11.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 18 14 32 56.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2017 7 9 16 43.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2018 22 19 41 53.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2018 4 17 21 19.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2019 11 15 26 42.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
31 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2020 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 2021 6 13 19 31.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 22 15 37 59.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7%
34 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 2023 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
35 2023 14 16 30 46.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2024 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 2025 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 2025 7 13 20 35.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2026 7 9 16 43.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
38 2026 4 13 17 23.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 76 152 228 33.3% 52 79 131 39.7% 36 30 66 54.5% — 168 191 359 46.8% 38 72 110 34.5% 26 31 57 45.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 320/357 of Tatjana Maria's and 495/529 of Shuai Zhang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tatjana Maria Shuai Zhang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/3 0.0 2.0 55.8% 62.1% 39.1% 42.9% 100.0% 51.9% 22.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 6/6 0.8 3.2 68.8% 53.0% 45.1% 47.6% 38.3% 50.3% 38.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/3 0.0 4.0 65.6% 47.9% 49.0% 39.4% 37.9% 48.5% 42.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 6/7 0.2 5.3 72.2% 51.8% 31.0% 48.7% 46.7% 46.1% 42.2%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 28/30 0.6 2.5 69.3% 54.9% 39.3% 47.4% 41.5% 50.2% 39.4%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 8/8 1.1 3.0 64.8% 56.8% 35.6% 43.8% 44.0% 49.6% 41.2%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 11/13 1.5 1.5 64.9% 68.1% 47.0% 62.4% 49.6% 60.4% 48.0%
25 2013 2/7 3.5 6.0 58.2% 51.5% 38.5% 58.6% 33.3% 45.9% 32.1% 2014 38/42 1.2 1.9 68.5% 57.4% 45.2% 51.5% 49.8% 53.8% 43.0%
26 2014 5/5 6.4 4.2 50.8% 62.2% 39.2% 46.8% 53.3% 51.2% 41.2% 2015 14/16 1.6 2.8 66.9% 60.1% 45.8% 51.2% 59.4% 55.0% 42.9%
27 2015 23/26 3.2 2.9 54.7% 68.0% 50.1% 58.5% 46.8% 59.8% 39.4% 2016 38/50 0.9 1.7 66.2% 58.7% 48.2% 49.5% 56.1% 55.2% 45.5%
28 2016 18/19 3.2 2.2 60.4% 59.2% 45.0% 47.9% 47.3% 53.6% 38.9% 2017 44/47 2.9 2.7 63.5% 65.5% 43.9% 54.0% 49.5% 57.6% 44.3%
29 2017 30/31 3.2 2.2 56.2% 69.6% 44.9% 57.7% 48.4% 58.7% 42.3% 2018 55/55 2.3 2.6 63.7% 63.6% 46.9% 52.4% 47.8% 57.3% 43.7%
30 2018 34/35 4.0 2.7 56.2% 63.7% 43.5% 50.8% 47.7% 54.5% 38.2% 2019 41/41 2.1 2.8 62.7% 62.5% 44.0% 51.7% 47.7% 55.7% 41.9%
31 2019 31/32 3.4 2.7 54.1% 63.3% 42.7% 48.7% 43.2% 54.0% 39.1% 2020 22/22 2.0 2.5 67.4% 61.9% 48.0% 48.9% 50.6% 57.2% 43.0%
32 2020 7/7 3.6 2.6 60.9% 53.6% 39.4% 47.2% 30.6% 47.8% 39.6% 2021 39/39 1.5 2.9 64.7% 59.8% 43.1% 53.0% 43.0% 54.0% 39.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 58/60 2.1 2.2 65.7% 64.3% 48.1% 45.8% 47.7% 58.8% 42.2%
34 2022 27/29 3.9 3.5 53.3% 71.0% 49.3% 55.7% 50.1% 60.8% 43.9% 2023 22/22 1.2 2.9 61.1% 57.6% 39.6% 41.4% 52.3% 50.6% 37.3%
35 2023 48/49 3.9 2.9 55.1% 65.7% 44.8% 49.5% 56.1% 56.5% 44.1% 2024 17/17 1.5 2.1 64.9% 61.4% 43.5% 45.0% 40.9% 55.0% 39.3%
36 2024 39/41 3.4 2.9 54.9% 60.2% 41.7% 45.7% 40.6% 52.2% 40.8% 2025 15/18 2.6 2.9 67.0% 60.0% 39.9% 39.2% 47.8% 53.4% 45.4%
37 2025 15/33 4.7 2.9 57.3% 59.9% 42.1% 43.5% 43.4% 52.1% 41.1% 2026 30/30 1.4 2.1 68.8% 60.1% 47.4% 54.3% 41.8% 56.1% 39.5%
38 2026 41/43 4.3 2.3 60.0% 67.0% 44.1% 53.1% 50.2% 57.7% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 320/428 3.8 2.8 56.1% 64.7% 44.4% 51.1% 47.6% 55.8% 41.2% — 495/530 1.7 2.5 65.6% 60.9% 44.8% 49.9% 48.0% 55.3% 42.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatjana Maria Shuai Zhang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1495 104.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.25
18 2006 1481 99.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16 2007 1464 103.0 -1.60 +0.26 0.473 38.5% +16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.21
19 2007 1452 109.9 — — — — +12 +66 +133 26.7% -1.40 0–2 — — -0.16 2008 1413 101.8 -1.83 -2.28 0.775 44.3% +21 — — 14.3% -2.21 0–2 0–2 — -0.06
20 2008 1424 111.5 — — — — +28 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 0–1 — -0.49 2009 1468 120.7 +2.65 +2.50 0.830 45.6% +21 — — 66.7% +0.33 — 1–0 — -0.05
21 2009 1493 111.4 — — — — -29 +34 — 36.4% -1.18 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -0.55 2010 1492 103.6 -3.51 -1.21 0.783 44.3% +26 — — 37.5% -1.19 2–0 1–1 — +0.51
22 2010 1497 109.5 — — — — -12 -1 — 35.7% -1.07 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.3 -0.82 2011 1445 108.6 -4.27 -3.16 0.790 44.9% +24 +34 — 30.8% -1.57 3–4 (43%) 1–6 (14%) 96.1 -0.05
23 2011 1469 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.16 2012 1457 113.5 -2.34 +0.08 0.817 45.5% +14 — — 23.5% -1.71 1–0 0–1 — -0.17
24 2012 1473 101.7 — — — — -16 — — 41.7% -0.67 1–1 1–1 — +0.36 2013 1599 123.5 +2.33 +1.26 1.212 54.5% -6 — — 70.4% +1.52 0–1 2–0 — +0.48
25 2013 1438 94.6 -2.28 -2.31 0.593 40.1% +20 +16 — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.01 2014 1600 117.2 -1.75 -0.53 0.931 48.5% -53 -65 +35 42.9% -0.46 10–6 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.61
26 2014 1447 95.9 -2.52 -1.88 0.844 46.7% +20 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 1–1 — +0.29 2015 1518 110.7 -2.05 -0.11 0.952 48.8% -20 -5 — 33.3% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.0 -0.54
27 2015 1479 110.7 +0.60 -1.33 0.980 49.7% -7 -43 +112 43.1% -0.31 1–5 (17%) 4–2 (67%) 99.3 +0.67 2016 1775 138.9 -0.62 +2.34 1.016 50.3% +20 -282 — 52.6% +0.18 8–1 (89%) 5–6 (45%) 106.8 -0.50
28 2016 1466 112.4 -1.11 -3.07 0.839 46.4% -9 -23 — 24.4% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.2 +0.04 2017 1775 137.4 +0.89 +0.70 1.045 51.0% +50 -290 -233 50.9% +0.34 8–10 (44%) 7–8 (47%) 99.0 +0.05
29 2017 1566 124.1 +1.13 -0.63 1.024 51.0% -48 -14 -21 46.0% -0.06 0–5 (0%) 1–0 — +0.89 2018 1727 132.0 +0.70 +0.72 1.025 50.7% +26 -168 — 52.4% +0.02 5–9 (36%) 9–8 (53%) 96.6 +2.55
30 2018 1632 116.0 -1.90 -3.62 0.840 46.7% -69 -111 +75 35.8% -1.16 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 104.4 -0.09 2019 1682 131.5 -0.59 -1.30 0.946 49.1% -17 -99 -24 47.7% -0.17 4–6 (40%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.27
31 2019 1578 121.2 -1.61 -2.85 0.849 46.9% +26 -142 +163 42.3% -0.79 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.1 -0.64 2020 1733 131.8 0.00 +0.35 1.003 50.0% -62 -39 — 52.0% -0.06 4–2 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 104.9 -0.07
32 2020 1587 109.8 -3.38 -1.03 0.757 43.7% +15 — — 25.0% -2.19 2–0 1–1 — -0.80 2021 1632 116.8 -1.99 -2.77 0.869 47.1% -13 -16 +97 43.2% -0.80 2–5 (29%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +0.69
33 2021 1511 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1733 139.5 +1.53 -0.47 1.023 50.4% -6 -140 +117 53.4% +0.09 6–2 (75%) 11–8 (58%) 106.7 +1.01
34 2022 1653 128.1 +2.42 +0.72 1.120 52.4% -89 -82 +219 60.0% +0.86 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 103.4 +1.07 2023 1524 112.2 -4.74 -4.13 0.755 43.8% +90 -25 +193 28.3% -1.61 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) 94.2 +0.93
35 2023 1705 130.4 +0.14 +0.47 1.013 50.4% -13 -95 +119 50.0% +0.10 6–10 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 94.6 +1.59 2024 1575 131.2 -0.87 -2.36 0.873 47.3% +48 — — 35.1% -1.08 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 97.8 -0.76
36 2024 1576 112.0 -3.26 -2.66 0.853 46.5% +21 -40 +207 33.0% -1.51 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) 97.1 +1.34 2025 1731 134.6 -2.26 +1.21 0.975 49.2% +29 — — 50.0% -0.25 6–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 108.2 -1.06
37 2025 1638 121.0 -2.97 -1.00 0.857 46.5% -65 -154 +320 44.7% -0.55 4–6 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 99.6 +0.70 2026 1698 130.8 -0.76 -1.93 0.899 47.7% +2 -169 +62 39.7% -0.74 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 100.8 -0.18
38 2026 1795 129.7 +0.55 -0.13 1.009 50.2% -227 -248 +315 44.9% -0.19 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 96.0 +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1822 123.0 -0.64 -1.31 0.932 48.7% -36 -65 +192 40.4% -0.69 44–69 (39%) 44–49 (47%) 97.2 +0.95 — 1858 134.2 -0.75 -0.61 0.945 48.8% +10 -114 +39 45.4% -0.37 63–66 (49%) 64–61 (51%) 103.1 +0.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.