H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:33 UTC
Tatjana Maria vs Yulia Putintseva H2H: 1-3
Yulia Putintseva holds a 3–1 lead over Tatjana Maria in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Yulia Putintseva leads 2–0 on clay, while Tatjana Maria leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tatjana Maria won the 2026 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2026 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Tatjana Maria | 6-4 6-4 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| Sep 22, 2023* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Yulia Putintseva | 6-4 6-7(6) 6-0 | Tatjana Maria | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2016* | Rabat | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Yulia Putintseva | 6-0 6-2 | Tatjana Maria | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2015* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Yulia Putintseva | 6-4 6-1 | Tatjana Maria | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatjana Maria | #76 | #41 | 1,320 | 1,810 | 164 | 254 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatjana Maria | Yulia Putintseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #89 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #223 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #268 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2015 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2016 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2018 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #72 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #86 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #68 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #54 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #45 | 1,638 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,810 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |