H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Tereza Martincova vs Jana Cepelova H2H: 0-1
Jana Cepelova holds a 1–0 lead over Tereza Martincova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Cepelova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Cepelova won the 2017 Tashkent third round 2-6 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 33
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2017* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jana Cepelova | 2-6 6-0 6-2 | Tereza Martincova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tereza Martincova | #283 | #40 | 1,293 | 1,800 | 70 | 102 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jana Cepelova | #894 | #50 | 1,074 | 1,685 | 55 | 91 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tereza Martincova | Jana Cepelova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #56 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #197 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #108 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #120 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #48 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |