H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:15 UTC
Tereza Martincova vs Olga Govortsova
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Tereza Martincova vs Olga Govortsova.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 37
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tereza Martincova | #283 | #40 | 1,293 | 1,800 | 70 | 102 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Olga Govortsova | #1,276 | #35 | 1,510 | 1,705 | 123 | 186 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tereza Martincova | Olga Govortsova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #48 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #47 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #75 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #111 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #197 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #57 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #120 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #149 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #48 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #71 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #170 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #320 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #393 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |