H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Catalina Castano holds a 1–0 lead over Tiantian Sun in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catalina Castano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Catalina Castano won the 2006 Pattaya round of 16 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalina Castano | 6-3 6-2 | Tiantian Sun | Match data | Feb 10, 2006* | R16 | Pattaya | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiantian Sun | #819 | #77 | 395 | 1,649 | 27 | 54 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Catalina Castano | #1,073 | #35 | 623 | 1,702 | 83 | 110 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tiantian Sun | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #126 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #105 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #194 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #230 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #57 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #54 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #254 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Tiantian Sun | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 2005 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 22 | 41 | 63 | 34.9% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | Career | 26 | 45 | 71 | 36.6% | 56 | 55 | 111 | 50.5% | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 28/56 of Tiantian Sun's and 80/171 of Catalina Castano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Tiantian Sun | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2003 | 1/9 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 59.4% | 60.5% | 30.8% | 28.6% | 28.6% | 48.4% | 40.0% | 2003 | 1/5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 62.5% | 45.7% | 38.1% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 42.9% | 39.6% |
| 2006 | 9/24 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 67.2% | 58.1% | 44.5% | 53.0% | 49.3% | 53.8% | 37.5% | 2004 | 3/14 | 0.3 | 3.7 | 64.4% | 45.1% | 37.0% | 43.9% | 46.7% | 42.2% | 37.8% |
| 2007 | 14/18 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 65.0% | 55.8% | 43.0% | 44.6% | 35.3% | 51.3% | 40.4% | 2005 | 5/40 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 58.6% | 61.1% | 43.2% | 52.7% | 40.0% | 53.5% | 41.1% |
| 2008 | 4/5 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 65.6% | 55.4% | 41.8% | 51.8% | 30.6% | 51.0% | 36.8% | 2006 | 20/47 | 2.1 | 2.7 | 61.3% | 58.8% | 42.7% | 49.0% | 49.5% | 52.2% | 42.3% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 22/30 | 1.5 | 3.3 | 62.1% | 58.1% | 43.9% | 50.7% | 38.5% | 52.8% | 41.6% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 11/15 | 1.4 | 3.7 | 61.4% | 61.7% | 48.0% | 58.5% | 56.5% | 55.8% | 42.0% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2/2 | 5.0 | 8.5 | 54.9% | 64.2% | 38.5% | 51.0% | 55.0% | 52.6% | 43.4% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9/10 | 1.4 | 4.0 | 63.4% | 60.6% | 47.4% | 45.7% | 45.1% | 55.5% | 46.6% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3/3 | 1.7 | 11.0 | 60.6% | 60.7% | 34.9% | 51.9% | 55.9% | 50.8% | 46.8% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 9.3 | 55.0% | 58.9% | 33.8% | 42.4% | 39.5% | 47.8% | 46.7% |
| — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1/2 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 48.9% | 48.9% | 46.8% | 60.0% | 30.8% | 47.8% | 47.9% |
| Career | 28/81 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 65.6% | 56.6% | 42.8% | 47.8% | 38.8% | 52.0% | 38.9% | Career | 80/193 | 1.8 | 3.9 | 61.1% | 58.8% | 43.4% | 50.3% | 45.8% | 52.6% | 42.7% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Tiantian Sun | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2002 | 1493 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.19 | 1999 | 1484 | 96.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.09 |
| 2003 | 1451 | 101.0 | -0.20 | -1.27 | 0.776 | 43.9% | +17 | — | — | 22.2% | -1.67 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.54 | 2000 | 1487 | 104.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +1.00 | — | — | — | +0.23 |
| 2004 | 1430 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | -34 | +118 | — | 24.0% | -1.68 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.02 | 2001 | 1490 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +45 | — | 38.2% | -0.88 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.9 | +0.20 |
| 2005 | 1520 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | — | 57.7% | +0.69 | 1–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.62 | 2002 | 1514 | 106.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +72 | — | 53.3% | -0.13 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–0 | — | +0.40 |
| 2006 | 1629 | 131.4 | -1.14 | -2.98 | 0.811 | 45.8% | -16 | — | — | 52.7% | -0.04 | 2–5 (29%) | — | — | -0.16 | 2003 | 1519 | 101.5 | -0.43 | -0.17 | 0.693 | 41.3% | — | +60 | — | 41.7% | -0.92 | 1–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.05 |
| 2007 | 1505 | 100.0 | -2.48 | -2.77 | 0.830 | 45.9% | +49 | -23 | — | 20.5% | -2.13 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.7 | -1.14 | 2004 | 1534 | 115.0 | -2.87 | -1.32 | 0.653 | 40.4% | -58 | +59 | — | 37.1% | -0.97 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–1 | — | -0.75 |
| 2008 | 1494 | 101.6 | -1.21 | -2.08 | 0.750 | 43.9% | +30 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.62 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.7 | +0.02 | 2005 | 1659 | 128.5 | -0.94 | -1.22 | 0.884 | 47.8% | -48 | +8 | — | 54.9% | +0.40 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–5 (50%) | 101.1 | -0.06 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1544 | 112.6 | -3.15 | -1.99 | 0.886 | 47.4% | -44 | +184 | -90 | 46.3% | -0.27 | 8–10 (44%) | 5–4 (56%) | 98.5 | +1.63 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1508 | 109.0 | -1.79 | -1.74 | 0.883 | 47.1% | -38 | +186 | — | 34.8% | -1.20 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.34 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1496 | 111.9 | -0.13 | -1.61 | 0.950 | 49.7% | -7 | +104 | — | 40.0% | -0.43 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–5 (0%) | 91.5 | -0.03 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1469 | 98.1 | -1.31 | +0.09 | 0.917 | 47.9% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1500 | 109.3 | -0.80 | +0.20 | 1.048 | 50.9% | — | +86 | — | 54.2% | +0.13 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | +0.58 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1514 | 102.2 | +1.09 | +0.50 | 0.951 | 49.0% | — | +93 | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | 2–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.45 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1511 | 101.0 | -0.68 | -1.14 | 0.894 | 47.6% | — | — | — | 37.5% | -0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1489 | 99.9 | +1.69 | -0.59 | 0.918 | 47.8% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.12 |
| Career | 1650 | 117.9 | -1.79 | -2.69 | 0.810 | 45.5% | 0 | +30 | — | 37.4% | -0.93 | 6–15 (29%) | 11–8 (58%) | 98.4 | -0.41 | Career | 1702 | 117.4 | -1.56 | -1.33 | 0.901 | 47.8% | -38 | +97 | -90 | 44.4% | -0.42 | 32–39 (45%) | 21–21 (50%) | 96.8 | +1.17 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginie Razzano | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 20, 2008 | H2H |
| Gisela Dulko | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 8, 2007 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 17, 2008 | H2H |
| Anastasia Rodionova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 6, 2008 | H2H |
| Martina Hingis | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 20, 2007 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 17, 2011 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 1, 2007 | H2H |
| Elena Dementieva | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 1, 2007 | H2H |
| Anna Smashnova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 29, 2006 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 15, 2006 | H2H |