H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Timea Babos vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 0-1
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 1–0 lead over Timea Babos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2017 Toronto third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 33
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2017* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-0 6-1 | Timea Babos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timea Babos | #453 | #25 | 1,675 | 1,768 | 123 | 177 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Timea Babos | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2012 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #88 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2014 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #99 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2015 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2016 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2017 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2018 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #59 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 |
| 26 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #89 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 |
| 28 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,497 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 |
| 29 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,455 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,480 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,451 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |