H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Timea Babos vs Rebecca Peterson H2H: 0-1

Rebecca Peterson holds a 1–0 lead over Timea Babos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rebecca Peterson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Peterson won the 2018 Wuhan Open first round 6-7(0) 6-4 4-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Timea Babos
Hungary Age 33 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Rebecca Peterson
Sweden Age 31 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rebecca Peterson #61 6-7(0) 6-4 4-1 (ret.) Timea Babos #56 Match data Sep 25, 2018* R64 Wuhan Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Timea Babos #451 #25 1,675 1,758 124 180 40.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Rebecca Peterson #573 #43 1,332 1,861 80 95 45.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Timea Babos Rebecca Peterson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
17 2010 0–1 0.0% #268 1,491 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #263 1,484 0 0
18 2011 1–1 50.0% #154 1,503 0 0 2014 1–2 33.3% #230 1,489 0 0
19 2012 14–15 48.3% #67 1,564 0 1 2015 3–4 42.9% #131 1,505 0 0
20 2013 9–16 36.0% #88 1,544 0 1 2016 3–6 33.3% #146 1,505 0 0
21 2014 4–11 26.7% #99 1,484 0 1 2017 2–3 40.0% #174 1,550 0 0
22 2015 12–21 36.4% #70 1,563 0 1 2018 10–11 47.6% #63 1,693 0 0
23 2016 35–28 55.6% #28 1,707 0 1 2019 25–18 58.1% #44 1,861 0 2
24 2017 20–26 43.5% #57 1,639 0 2 2020 3–10 23.1% #55 1,697 0 2
25 2018 19–24 44.2% #59 1,609 0 3 2021 18–18 50.0% #88 1,699 0 2
26 2019 6–16 27.3% #89 1,594 0 3 2022 7–14 33.3% #119 1,659 0 2
27 2020 0–6 0.0% #115 1,540 0 3 2023 8–7 53.3% #127 1,647 0 2
28 2021 3–9 25.0% #160 1,495 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2022 0–1 0.0% #336 1,454 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2023 1–3 25.0% #188 1,480 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2024 0–2 0.0% #338 1,450 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Timea Babos Rebecca Peterson
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
20 2013 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2016 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
21 2014 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2017 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2015 6 11 17 35.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2018 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2016 25 19 44 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2019 17 9 26 65.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2017 19 17 36 52.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 2020 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
25 2018 17 16 33 51.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2021 15 13 28 53.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2019 5 13 18 27.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2022 4 8 12 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2023 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 90 113 203 44.3% 25 45 70 35.7% 9 22 31 29.0% — 58 51 109 53.2% 18 34 52 34.6% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 283/304 of Timea Babos's and 168/174 of Rebecca Peterson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Timea Babos Rebecca Peterson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 57.1% 61.1% 37.0% 50.0% 16.7% 50.8% 33.3% 2013 1/1 1.0 3.0 64.3% 41.7% 40.0% 45.5% 66.7% 41.1% 42.2%
18 2011 2/2 2.5 2.5 60.9% 71.5% 44.6% 50.0% 51.0% 61.3% 43.0% 2014 3/3 0.7 4.0 64.5% 51.3% 36.8% 49.5% 42.5% 46.3% 44.1%
19 2012 26/29 5.0 4.3 60.5% 65.8% 43.9% 52.1% 43.9% 57.0% 41.9% 2015 5/7 0.8 4.8 70.0% 57.3% 48.6% 36.8% 50.3% 55.0% 41.0%
20 2013 24/25 4.5 3.8 57.6% 62.5% 43.5% 48.6% 46.0% 54.5% 39.3% 2016 9/9 1.6 3.6 68.4% 61.4% 41.7% 48.7% 51.7% 55.4% 40.7%
21 2014 13/15 5.7 4.2 60.5% 65.3% 43.7% 57.7% 37.2% 56.8% 38.9% 2017 5/5 2.2 3.2 64.2% 63.6% 48.6% 73.1% 59.8% 58.0% 42.1%
22 2015 25/33 3.3 3.3 67.1% 62.8% 48.2% 50.8% 42.4% 57.7% 38.1% 2018 21/21 3.6 3.7 63.7% 62.9% 41.3% 57.6% 50.4% 55.0% 43.1%
23 2016 57/63 4.5 3.6 62.3% 66.7% 46.0% 50.8% 46.3% 58.9% 43.2% 2019 42/43 2.2 2.8 67.1% 61.9% 50.4% 57.2% 44.5% 58.0% 43.3%
24 2017 46/46 4.6 3.5 62.3% 68.8% 43.7% 54.7% 49.3% 59.4% 40.0% 2020 13/13 1.5 2.8 66.5% 55.9% 44.5% 36.8% 30.4% 51.8% 39.5%
25 2018 42/43 4.4 4.0 60.0% 68.8% 46.8% 57.6% 44.3% 60.0% 41.8% 2021 34/36 2.3 3.4 65.5% 62.2% 47.7% 52.4% 47.4% 57.1% 41.3%
26 2019 22/22 3.9 4.5 58.6% 64.9% 40.5% 59.3% 38.6% 54.7% 37.9% 2022 20/21 1.9 3.7 63.7% 61.1% 42.5% 45.1% 45.0% 54.0% 39.8%
27 2020 6/6 1.0 3.5 59.2% 63.9% 42.1% 38.2% 45.8% 54.9% 31.3% 2023 15/15 2.1 4.1 65.3% 64.3% 40.5% 53.5% 51.5% 55.9% 45.3%
28 2021 12/12 4.3 4.3 55.0% 61.9% 39.8% 45.9% 48.4% 52.3% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2022 1/1 3.0 4.0 60.6% 55.0% 46.2% 60.0% 25.0% 51.5% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 4/4 1.8 4.3 62.9% 60.5% 40.4% 53.2% 74.6% 52.8% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 2/2 9.0 3.5 57.7% 62.3% 54.4% 77.3% 19.6% 59.0% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 283/304 4.3 3.8 61.0% 66.0% 44.6% 53.1% 45.0% 57.6% 40.4% — 168/175 2.2 3.4 65.7% 61.3% 45.5% 52.1% 46.5% 55.8% 42.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Timea Babos Rebecca Peterson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1488 95.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02
17 2010 1491 99.7 +0.22 -2.30 0.677 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 2013 1485 102.5 +3.18 +1.91 0.716 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.28
18 2011 1503 104.3 +0.80 +0.51 1.109 51.4% — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.11 2014 1490 101.8 -1.67 +0.24 0.821 45.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10
19 2012 1564 115.8 +1.04 -1.36 0.976 49.4% +20 -33 +62 49.3% -0.38 5–8 (38%) 6–5 (55%) 101.9 +0.38 2015 1505 104.6 -0.71 -1.19 0.911 47.7% — -1 — 37.5% -1.06 2–0 1–1 — -0.09
20 2013 1544 111.1 -0.34 -3.76 0.862 46.9% +14 +4 — 38.6% -0.95 5–4 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 102.2 -0.12 2016 1506 107.2 -0.91 -1.94 0.911 48.2% +59 -42 — 42.1% -0.37 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
21 2014 1484 110.0 -0.66 -2.53 0.902 47.8% -2 — +90 40.0% -0.17 1–6 (14%) 1–3 (25%) 91.7 +0.74 2017 1550 106.4 +0.60 -1.14 1.003 50.3% +49 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 0–1 — -0.10
22 2015 1563 124.4 +0.04 -1.97 0.900 47.9% -39 -34 +34 38.2% -0.59 5–5 (50%) 4–8 (33%) 99.5 -2.03 2018 1693 125.9 -0.84 -0.13 0.960 49.2% +26 -250 -63 46.7% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 98.7 +0.29
23 2016 1708 138.3 +2.77 +0.15 1.051 51.1% -28 -88 -104 53.8% +0.53 11–9 (55%) 7–12 (37%) 101.7 -0.26 2019 1862 140.3 +1.54 +0.91 1.032 50.8% -2 -323 -222 53.6% +0.22 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 106.5 -2.59
24 2017 1639 130.8 +1.85 -2.67 0.986 49.9% +63 -67 -124 48.6% -0.01 6–13 (32%) 6–6 (50%) 93.3 +1.56 2020 1698 103.7 -2.62 -2.51 0.819 45.3% +41 -190 — 20.8% -2.08 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.28
25 2018 1610 134.0 +2.55 -1.23 1.046 50.9% +53 -69 -106 50.0% +0.25 3–11 (21%) 3–7 (30%) 88.6 +0.06 2021 1700 129.0 +0.81 -0.92 0.963 49.2% +11 -79 — 49.4% -0.04 6–7 (46%) 6–6 (50%) 103.0 -0.71
26 2019 1595 114.5 -1.44 -4.46 0.838 46.6% +29 -87 — 35.4% -1.15 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.4 +0.77 2022 1659 117.2 -1.27 -2.53 0.866 47.2% +49 -54 — 33.3% -0.89 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.50
27 2020 1540 108.8 +0.56 -3.13 0.694 43.3% +28 — — 7.7% -2.85 0–1 1–0 — -0.09 2023 1647 126.0 -0.31 +1.31 1.028 50.7% +73 -62 — 48.5% +0.12 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 97.8 -0.35
28 2021 1496 105.1 -3.04 -3.61 0.789 45.0% +56 -88 — 29.2% -1.79 1–1 2–0 — +0.01 2024 1645 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2022 1454 101.3 +1.41 -1.79 0.796 44.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 1481 113.2 -0.36 -1.04 0.905 48.0% — -15 — 33.3% -1.11 0–1 0–1 — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 1451 103.6 -0.62 +0.09 0.841 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–2 — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1758 128.1 +1.05 -1.91 0.952 49.0% +18 -54 -13 44.6% -0.28 38–68 (36%) 39–50 (44%) 90.6 +0.30 — 1862 129.7 0.00 -0.51 0.952 49.0% +25 -149 -151 44.3% -0.36 28–25 (53%) 18–28 (39%) 101.5 -2.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.