H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Timea Bacsinszky vs Elena Dementieva H2H: 0-1
Elena Dementieva holds a 1–0 lead over Timea Bacsinszky in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Dementieva leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2008 Wimbledon second round 4-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2008* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Elena Dementieva | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Timea Bacsinszky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timea Bacsinszky | #941 | #9 | 3,157 | 1,933 | 161 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Elena Dementieva | #10 | #3 | 8,286 | 2,108 | 472 | 243 | 66.0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Timea Bacsinszky | Elena Dementieva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #15 | 1,833 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #53 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #19 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #8 | 1,966 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,925 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2014 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #48 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2015 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,014 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2016 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,777 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 1,981 | 0 | 13 |
| 28 | 2017 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #39 | 1,816 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #191 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #139 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |