H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Timea Bacsinszky vs Nadia Lalami H2H: 1-0
Timea Bacsinszky holds a 1–0 lead over Nadia Lalami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Timea Bacsinszky leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Timea Bacsinszky won the 2008 Fes third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 36
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2008* | Fes | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Timea Bacsinszky | 6-2 6-4 | Nadia Lalami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timea Bacsinszky | #941 | #9 | 3,157 | 1,933 | 161 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Nadia Lalami | #1,263 | #322 | 153 | 1,500 | 2 | 7 | 22.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Timea Bacsinszky | Nadia Lalami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #717 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #687 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #53 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #335 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1103 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2014 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #48 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,777 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #39 | 1,816 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #191 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #139 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |