H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Timea Bacsinszky vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 0-1
Nathalie Dechy holds a 1–0 lead over Timea Bacsinszky in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 2004 Zurich third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2004* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Nathalie Dechy | 6-1 6-4 | Timea Bacsinszky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timea Bacsinszky | #941 | #9 | 3,157 | 1,933 | 161 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Timea Bacsinszky | Nathalie Dechy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #53 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2014 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #48 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,777 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #39 | 1,816 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #191 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2019 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #139 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |