H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tina Pisnik vs Renata Voracova H2H: 0-1
Renata Voracova holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Pisnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Renata Voracova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Renata Voracova won the 2003 Palermo third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2003* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Renata Voracova | 6-4 6-3 | Tina Pisnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tina Pisnik | #592 | #29 | 1,046 | 1,721 | 91 | 117 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Renata Voracova | #1,041 | #74 | 848 | 1,523 | 24 | 54 | 30.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tina Pisnik | Renata Voracova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #81 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #128 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #31 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #131 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #81 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #184 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #212 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #844 | 1,396 | 0 | 0 |