H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tsvetana Pironkova vs Alisa Kleybanova H2H: 0-2
Alisa Kleybanova holds a 2–0 lead over Tsvetana Pironkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alisa Kleybanova leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alisa Kleybanova won the 2010 Indian Wells second round 6-7(5) 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2010* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Alisa Kleybanova | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | Tsvetana Pironkova | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2009* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Alisa Kleybanova | 6-2 7-6(3) | Tsvetana Pironkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tsvetana Pironkova | #1,170 | #31 | 1,805 | 1,770 | 169 | 222 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Alisa Kleybanova | #784 | #20 | 2,485 | 1,875 | 108 | 92 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tsvetana Pironkova | Alisa Kleybanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2005 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #86 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #64 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #32 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #95 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #44 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #68 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2010 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #545 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2011 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #46 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2012 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #42 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2013 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #38 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #59 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #136 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #252 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |