H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tsvetana Pironkova vs Ekaterina Ivanova H2H: 1-0
Tsvetana Pironkova holds a 1–0 lead over Ekaterina Ivanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tsvetana Pironkova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tsvetana Pironkova won the 2008 Prague third round 6-1 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2008* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tsvetana Pironkova | 6-1 7-6(5) | Ekaterina Ivanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tsvetana Pironkova | #1,170 | #31 | 1,805 | 1,770 | 169 | 222 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Ekaterina Ivanova | #1,270 | #136 | 464 | 1,514 | 10 | 16 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tsvetana Pironkova | Ekaterina Ivanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #86 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #64 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #95 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #141 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #44 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #46 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #42 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #108 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #38 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #59 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #136 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #252 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |