H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Urszula Radwanska vs Eleni Daniilidou H2H: 2-1
Urszula Radwanska holds a 2–1 lead over Eleni Daniilidou in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Urszula Radwanska leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Eleni Daniilidou leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Urszula Radwanska won the 2012 Stanford third round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GRE
Age 43
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2012* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Urszula Radwanska | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
| Sep 17, 2011* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Urszula Radwanska | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
| Apr 21, 2011* | Fes | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Eleni Daniilidou | 2-6 7-6(8) 6-4 | Urszula Radwanska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urszula Radwanska | #493 | #29 | 1,565 | 1,747 | 99 | 130 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eleni Daniilidou | #1,070 | #14 | 1,639 | 1,878 | 185 | 203 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Urszula Radwanska | Eleni Daniilidou | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #313 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #252 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2012 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #31 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #34 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2013 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #40 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #69 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #179 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #36 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2015 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #94 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #257 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #100 | 1,483 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #186 | 1,431 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,412 | 0 | 5 |