H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Urszula Radwanska vs Vesna Dolonc H2H: 1-1
Urszula Radwanska and Vesna Dolonc are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Urszula Radwanska won the 2014 Tashkent third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2014* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Urszula Radwanska | 6-2 6-2 | Vesna Dolonc | Match data |
| Sep 19, 2013* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Vesna Dolonc | 7-5 6-2 | Urszula Radwanska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urszula Radwanska | #493 | #29 | 1,565 | 1,747 | 99 | 130 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vesna Dolonc | #603 | #84 | 788 | 1,579 | 23 | 40 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Urszula Radwanska | Vesna Dolonc | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #313 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #252 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #31 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #40 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #179 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #105 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #94 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #257 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |