H2H data updated: 2026-11-07 00:00 UTC

Vania King vs Renata Voracova H2H: 1-0

Vania King holds a 1–0 lead over Renata Voracova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vania King leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vania King won the 2007 Quebec City round of 16 6-2 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Renata Voracova
Czech Republic Age 43 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vania King #113 6-2 4-6 6-4 Renata Voracova #114 Match data Nov 2, 2007* R16 Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Vania King — #50 1,225 1,767 128 161 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Renata Voracova — #74 848 1,523 24 54 30.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vania King Renata Voracova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 2007 15–22 40.5% #109 1,629 0 1 2002 2–5 28.6% #128 1,462 0 0
19 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,520 0 1 2003 2–5 28.6% #145 1,456 0 0
20 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,592 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,598 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,692 0 1 2006 1–1 50.0% #155 1,461 0 0
23 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,618 0 1 2007 4–8 33.3% #107 1,477 0 0
24 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1 2008 2–6 25.0% #147 1,453 0 0
25 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1 2009 1–1 50.0% #126 1,461 0 0
26 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1 2010 7–11 38.9% #81 1,496 0 0
27 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1 2011 3–11 21.4% #184 1,443 0 0
28 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1 2013 2–1 66.7% #212 1,467 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2014 0–2 0.0% #169 1,444 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2015 0–2 0.0% #253 1,422 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,397 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Vania King Renata Voracova
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 11 15 26 42.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
24 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 1 5 6 16.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
28 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 96 110 206 46.6% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6% — 9 29 38 23.7% 15 23 38 39.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 237/289 of Vania King's and 47/62 of Renata Voracova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Vania King Renata Voracova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 21/37 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5% 2007 6/12 0.3 6.8 64.1% 55.0% 40.3% 51.1% 57.8% 49.8% 47.8%
24 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1% 2008 5/8 1.6 5.0 67.6% 61.2% 46.9% 41.7% 36.1% 56.9% 42.5%
25 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6% 2009 1/2 0.0 5.0 74.4% 53.3% 41.9% 46.7% 66.7% 50.4% 49.5%
26 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7% 2010 17/18 1.1 3.4 67.5% 57.2% 38.8% 43.8% 56.7% 50.8% 43.5%
27 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1% 2011 11/14 1.8 3.8 62.3% 51.4% 43.2% 40.6% 52.7% 48.2% 42.5%
28 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7% 2013 2/3 1.0 3.5 68.8% 68.3% 47.6% 73.2% 67.0% 62.7% 46.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 2/2 1.0 3.5 70.3% 51.0% 51.3% 41.0% 70.0% 51.1% 31.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 2/2 1.0 7.5 77.7% 46.1% 45.5% 43.6% 39.3% 45.9% 44.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 2.0 6.0 64.3% 55.6% 35.0% 42.9% 0.0% 48.2% 21.4%
Career — 237/289 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4% — 47/78 1.2 4.4 66.6% 55.6% 42.1% 44.9% 52.9% 50.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Vania King Renata Voracova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1629 118.6 -1.36 -3.67 0.818 45.8% +20 -161 +14 42.0% -0.72 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 -1.51 2002 1462 98.5 — — — — +38 +58 — 25.0% -1.13 2–0 0–1 — +0.56
19 2008 1521 117.8 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +52 -54 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.6 -1.10 2003 1457 106.1 — — — — -4 +87 — 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.20
20 2009 1592 115.0 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +24 -123 -32 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.8 +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 1599 118.2 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +26 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 1692 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -17 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31 2006 1461 97.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.17 1–1 — — +0.21
23 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -45 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01 2007 1477 104.8 -3.02 +1.07 0.952 49.1% -36 +87 — 36.0% -1.16 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.50
24 2013 1632 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% 0 -44 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53 2008 1454 111.9 +1.06 -1.00 0.986 49.7% -6 — — 43.5% -0.39 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.14
25 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +19 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14 2009 1461 103.2 -2.65 -0.01 0.998 50.0% — — — 50.0% -0.67 1–1 1–1 — +0.14
26 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02 2010 1496 107.9 -3.16 -0.52 0.884 47.5% -58 +99 — 37.8% -0.97 1–0 3–0 (100%) — +0.14
27 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71 2011 1443 104.2 -3.82 -1.25 0.821 45.3% -11 +78 — 27.3% -1.57 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — -0.09
28 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 1560 108.6 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +8 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17 2013 1468 105.1 +0.68 -1.22 1.235 55.0% — +80 — 66.7% +1.50 — — — +0.34
30 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1444 99.0 -1.90 -2.01 0.637 42.4% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — +0.08
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1422 94.5 -3.10 -1.02 0.826 45.0% — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 1–0 — +0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1408 94.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1398 96.3 -2.14 +1.46 0.414 36.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1448 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1453 96.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1446 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1437 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1768 128.4 -0.67 -0.73 0.935 48.6% +18 -80 -68 46.0% -0.32 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 103.9 -1.91 — 1523 104.4 -2.60 -0.60 0.877 47.3% -17 +86 — 35.8% -1.02 9–18 (33%) 8–7 (53%) 96.7 +1.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.