H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Vania King holds a 1–0 lead over Tiantian Sun in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vania King leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vania King won the 2007 Miami Open round of 128 7-6(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vania King | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Tiantian Sun | Match data | Mar 20, 2007* | R128 | Miami Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vania King | #824 | #50 | 1,225 | 1,767 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tiantian Sun | #819 | #77 | 395 | 1,649 | 27 | 54 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vania King | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #60 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #126 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #128 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #105 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #230 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #76 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #111 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #78 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #492 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #356 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Vania King | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | ||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2005 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2003 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2004 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 2008 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2005 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2006 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 2010 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2007 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 2011 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2008 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 96 | 109 | 205 | 46.8% | 26 | 36 | 62 | 41.9% | 6 | 15 | 21 | 28.6% | Career | 22 | 41 | 63 | 34.9% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 237/288 of Vania King's and 28/56 of Tiantian Sun's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Vania King | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2005 | 1/2 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 63.3% | 52.6% | 36.4% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 46.7% | 33.3% | 2003 | 1/9 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 59.4% | 60.5% | 30.8% | 28.6% | 28.6% | 48.4% | 40.0% |
| 2006 | 9/29 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 71.3% | 60.7% | 43.6% | 55.0% | 59.8% | 55.8% | 44.1% | 2006 | 9/24 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 67.2% | 58.1% | 44.5% | 53.0% | 49.3% | 53.8% | 37.5% |
| 2007 | 21/36 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 63.7% | 58.9% | 44.6% | 48.9% | 39.1% | 54.0% | 37.7% | 2007 | 14/18 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 65.0% | 55.8% | 43.0% | 44.6% | 35.3% | 51.3% | 40.4% |
| 2008 | 25/26 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 66.0% | 61.8% | 43.9% | 51.8% | 42.8% | 55.6% | 39.5% | 2008 | 4/5 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 65.6% | 55.4% | 41.8% | 51.8% | 30.6% | 51.0% | 36.8% |
| 2009 | 20/23 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 63.1% | 58.0% | 46.4% | 47.2% | 37.3% | 53.7% | 42.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 29/31 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 65.9% | 61.5% | 41.9% | 49.4% | 41.0% | 55.1% | 44.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 24/27 | 0.6 | 3.6 | 64.0% | 59.5% | 42.2% | 53.5% | 45.2% | 53.2% | 44.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 33/34 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 64.1% | 62.4% | 47.4% | 51.5% | 43.8% | 57.0% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 17/19 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 69.2% | 57.3% | 46.4% | 44.7% | 46.8% | 53.7% | 41.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 25/28 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 64.2% | 58.6% | 47.1% | 50.6% | 43.5% | 54.3% | 42.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 61.3% | 55.3% | 33.3% | 16.7% | 50.0% | 46.8% | 39.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24/24 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 63.1% | 64.2% | 43.8% | 58.8% | 50.1% | 56.6% | 44.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 4/4 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 70.4% | 50.1% | 40.7% | 56.3% | 55.7% | 48.5% | 38.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 4/4 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 60.3% | 52.3% | 38.6% | 54.3% | 41.8% | 47.0% | 40.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 237/288 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 65.0% | 60.2% | 44.5% | 51.2% | 44.0% | 54.7% | 42.4% | Career | 28/81 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 65.6% | 56.6% | 42.8% | 47.8% | 38.8% | 52.0% | 38.9% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Vania King | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2005 | 1520 | 103.7 | -0.64 | +0.14 | 0.625 | 40.2% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.17 | 2002 | 1493 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.19 |
| 2006 | 1663 | 131.1 | -1.06 | -0.47 | 0.997 | 50.5% | +24 | — | — | 55.0% | +0.35 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–1 (67%) | 99.5 | -0.14 | 2003 | 1451 | 101.0 | -0.20 | -1.27 | 0.776 | 43.9% | +17 | — | — | 22.2% | -1.67 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.54 |
| 2007 | 1625 | 116.9 | -1.39 | -3.73 | 0.818 | 45.8% | +17 | -157 | +16 | 43.0% | -0.67 | 5–4 (56%) | 7–4 (64%) | 102.4 | -1.23 | 2004 | 1430 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | -34 | +118 | — | 24.0% | -1.68 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 2008 | 1519 | 117.6 | +0.05 | -3.22 | 0.890 | 47.7% | +49 | -52 | — | 33.9% | -0.89 | 5–7 (42%) | 1–5 (17%) | 94.7 | -1.09 | 2005 | 1520 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | — | 57.7% | +0.69 | 1–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.62 |
| 2009 | 1592 | 114.9 | -1.54 | -1.39 | 0.910 | 48.1% | +21 | -123 | -33 | 44.9% | -0.45 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.9 | +0.36 | 2006 | 1629 | 131.4 | -1.14 | -2.98 | 0.811 | 45.8% | -16 | — | — | 52.7% | -0.04 | 2–5 (29%) | — | — | -0.16 |
| 2010 | 1598 | 117.8 | -1.20 | +0.84 | 0.997 | 49.8% | +24 | -97 | -78 | 49.3% | -0.17 | 4–9 (31%) | 1–4 (20%) | 94.1 | +0.43 | 2007 | 1505 | 100.0 | -2.48 | -2.77 | 0.830 | 45.9% | +49 | -23 | — | 20.5% | -2.13 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.7 | -1.14 |
| 2011 | 1691 | 130.5 | -1.09 | +0.98 | 0.960 | 48.9% | -18 | -128 | — | 48.4% | -0.17 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.8 | -1.31 | 2008 | 1494 | 101.6 | -1.21 | -2.08 | 0.750 | 43.9% | +30 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.62 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.7 | +0.02 |
| 2012 | 1618 | 128.3 | +0.93 | +0.08 | 1.011 | 50.1% | +21 | -46 | — | 48.0% | -0.05 | 3–6 (33%) | 5–3 (63%) | 99.5 | -1.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1631 | 118.3 | -0.91 | -1.79 | 0.887 | 47.5% | +1 | -43 | — | 41.7% | -0.79 | 6–4 (60%) | 3–3 (50%) | 103.1 | -0.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 1650 | 125.5 | -1.58 | -0.66 | 0.932 | 48.6% | +18 | -55 | -202 | 49.2% | -0.07 | 7–4 (64%) | 3–2 (60%) | 105.8 | -1.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1635 | 102.3 | +0.69 | -0.52 | 0.746 | 43.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 1646 | 125.1 | +0.57 | +0.85 | 1.016 | 50.3% | +12 | -20 | — | 53.7% | +0.11 | 3–3 (50%) | 5–2 (71%) | 102.4 | +0.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1593 | 108.4 | -1.97 | -0.89 | 0.750 | 44.4% | +4 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1560 | 104.4 | -2.66 | -1.04 | 0.768 | 44.2% | +6 | — | — | 25.0% | -2.25 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1541 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1767 | 127.9 | -0.67 | -0.74 | 0.935 | 48.6% | +17 | -80 | -68 | 46.2% | -0.31 | 46–50 (48%) | 34–30 (53%) | 104.0 | -1.80 | Career | 1650 | 117.9 | -1.79 | -2.69 | 0.810 | 45.5% | 0 | +30 | — | 37.4% | -0.93 | 6–15 (29%) | 11–8 (58%) | 98.4 | -0.41 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniela Hantuchova | 0 | 7 | 7 | Feb 11, 2012 | H2H |
| Marion Bartoli | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 20, 2012 | H2H |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jul 30, 2012 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 9, 2012 | H2H |
| Ana Ivanovic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Mar 21, 2012 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginie Razzano | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 20, 2008 | H2H |
| Gisela Dulko | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 8, 2007 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 17, 2008 | H2H |
| Anastasia Rodionova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 6, 2008 | H2H |
| Martina Hingis | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 20, 2007 | H2H |