H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Varvara Gracheva vs Anna-Lena Friedsam H2H: 1-0
Varvara Gracheva holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Friedsam in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Varvara Gracheva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Varvara Gracheva won the 2023 Charleston second round 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 25
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2023* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Varvara Gracheva | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2023 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Varvara Gracheva | 7-6(5) 6-7(6) 6-4 | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Match data |
| Feb 6, 2023 | Linz | WTA 500 | Q2 | Clay | Anna-Lena Friedsam | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | Varvara Gracheva | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2020 | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | Q2 | Hard | Anna-Lena Friedsam | 7-5 6-4 | Varvara Gracheva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Varvara Gracheva | #95 | #39 | 1,290 | 1,833 | 85 | 117 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | #227 | #45 | 1,160 | 1,740 | 61 | 83 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Varvara Gracheva | Anna-Lena Friedsam | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #77 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #85 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #66 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #483 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #95 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #111 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #135 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |