H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Varvara Lepchenko vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 3-1

Varvara Lepchenko holds a 3–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Varvara Lepchenko leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Varvara Lepchenko won the 2014 Madrid second round 6-4 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Varvara Lepchenko
USA Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 7, 2014* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Varvara Lepchenko #48 6-4 4-6 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #120 Match data
Sep 21, 2012* Seoul WTA 250 R16 Hard Varvara Lepchenko #21 6-4 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #38 Match data
May 11, 2012* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Varvara Lepchenko #77 6-1 6-7(3) 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #30 Match data
May 29, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #23 6-1 2-6 6-2 Varvara Lepchenko #97 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Varvara Lepchenko #172 #19 1,875 1,804 155 220 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2005 2–1 66.7% #132 1,510 0 0 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2006 2–6 25.0% #98 1,491 0 0 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2007 2–10 16.7% #139 1,452 0 0 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
22 2008 2–4 33.3% #121 1,449 0 0 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
23 2009 5–12 29.4% #102 1,456 0 0 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
24 2010 4–10 28.6% #74 1,469 0 0 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
25 2011 6–12 33.3% #127 1,509 0 0 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
26 2012 24–19 55.8% #21 1,717 0 0 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2013 16–25 39.0% #54 1,613 0 0 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2014 27–19 58.7% #35 1,756 0 0 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2015 17–22 43.6% #47 1,636 0 0 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2016 15–17 46.9% #90 1,604 0 0 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2017 17–21 44.7% #63 1,704 0 0 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #129 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2019 2–11 15.4% #173 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–2 0.0% #181 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2021 3–5 37.5% #127 1,584 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2024 3–5 37.5% #129 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
39 2025 0–2 0.0% #147 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
40 2026 2–3 40.0% #172 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —