H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Varvara Lepchenko vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 3-1

Varvara Lepchenko holds a 3–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Varvara Lepchenko leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Varvara Lepchenko won the 2014 Madrid Open round of 64 6-4 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Varvara Lepchenko
United States Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Varvara Lepchenko #48 6-4 4-6 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #120 Match data May 7, 2014* R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Varvara Lepchenko #21 6-4 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #38 Match data Sep 21, 2012* R16 Korea Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Varvara Lepchenko #77 6-1 6-7(3) 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #30 Match data May 11, 2012* R16 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Anabel Medina Garrigues #23 6-1 2-6 6-2 Varvara Lepchenko #97 Match data May 29, 2007* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Varvara Lepchenko #181 #19 1,875 1,802 156 221 41.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,834 310 278 52.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,495 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,562 0 1
19 2005 2–1 66.7% #132 1,509 0 0 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2006 2–6 25.0% #98 1,491 0 0 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2007 2–10 16.7% #139 1,452 0 0 2004 25–23 52.1% #39 1,708 0 2
22 2008 2–4 33.3% #121 1,448 0 0 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,744 0 4
23 2009 5–12 29.4% #102 1,456 0 0 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,689 0 6
24 2010 4–10 28.6% #74 1,469 0 0 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,682 0 7
25 2011 6–12 33.3% #127 1,508 0 0 2008 41–25 62.1% #22 1,819 0 8
26 2012 25–20 55.6% #21 1,712 0 0 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2013 16–25 39.0% #54 1,606 0 0 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,567 0 9
28 2014 27–19 58.7% #35 1,753 0 0 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,783 0 11
29 2015 17–22 43.6% #47 1,637 0 0 2012 23–26 46.9% #50 1,618 0 11
30 2016 15–17 46.9% #90 1,608 0 0 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,541 0 11
31 2017 17–21 44.7% #63 1,705 0 0 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,491 0 11
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #129 1,631 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2019 2–10 16.7% #173 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–2 0.0% #181 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2021 3–5 37.5% #127 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2024 3–5 37.5% #129 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
39 2025 0–2 0.0% #147 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
40 2026 2–4 33.3% #181 1,514 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Anabel Medina Garrigues
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2005 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2005 12 15 27 44.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2009 0 6 6 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 2006 14 14 28 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2010 0 5 5 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 15 5 20 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 21 15 36 58.3% 18 7 25 72.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 19 18 37 51.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2013 7 17 24 29.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 4 13 17 23.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2014 20 12 32 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2015 16 13 29 55.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2012 8 13 21 38.1% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2016 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2013 2 8 10 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2017 10 13 23 43.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2018 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2026 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 95 132 227 41.9% 50 63 113 44.2% 11 25 36 30.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — 125 149 274 45.6% 168 99 267 62.9% 15 21 36 41.7% 2 9 11 18.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 344/373 of Varvara Lepchenko's and 326/508 of Anabel Medina Garrigues's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Anabel Medina Garrigues
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2006 6/8 0.8 4.0 64.2% 50.1% 45.8% 48.2% 45.8% 49.2% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 11/12 1.6 3.0 70.2% 56.8% 37.3% 52.7% 47.3% 50.7% 37.1% 2004 6/48 1.8 0.7 78.0% 58.3% 59.5% 62.0% 59.9% 58.6% 46.3%
22 2008 3/6 1.3 2.0 63.0% 53.9% 56.6% 58.3% 16.7% 55.1% 31.7% 2005 5/51 2.2 1.8 64.4% 56.8% 36.3% 52.9% 45.1% 49.6% 48.6%
23 2009 15/17 1.2 2.5 70.0% 59.4% 49.2% 53.3% 49.4% 55.7% 41.6% 2006 24/58 0.8 1.8 61.8% 56.1% 49.6% 49.2% 58.3% 53.5% 44.6%
24 2010 13/14 2.8 2.8 63.9% 59.9% 45.7% 44.4% 44.4% 54.9% 41.7% 2007 42/47 1.2 1.7 62.3% 63.3% 47.4% 49.5% 51.9% 57.3% 44.3%
25 2011 17/18 2.0 3.6 66.2% 56.3% 43.0% 48.5% 48.8% 51.6% 43.0% 2008 51/66 1.1 1.0 67.2% 61.0% 52.7% 53.2% 53.7% 58.3% 47.3%
26 2012 42/45 2.6 3.0 63.3% 63.2% 48.3% 51.9% 50.2% 57.7% 41.5% 2009 47/59 1.1 1.7 65.4% 63.4% 45.4% 46.8% 51.9% 56.9% 46.0%
27 2013 37/41 2.0 3.3 65.0% 60.6% 45.5% 49.4% 42.0% 55.3% 42.4% 2010 40/43 1.1 1.8 63.9% 59.5% 46.7% 50.2% 45.9% 54.8% 46.0%
28 2014 43/46 1.9 2.9 67.1% 62.3% 47.9% 56.8% 47.8% 57.6% 44.8% 2011 44/56 0.7 1.0 66.7% 62.3% 49.9% 48.2% 55.5% 58.3% 49.6%
29 2015 31/39 2.2 2.8 69.3% 59.5% 51.1% 44.3% 43.0% 56.4% 40.3% 2012 46/49 1.5 1.3 64.2% 60.7% 46.8% 54.9% 42.5% 55.9% 42.8%
30 2016 32/32 2.6 2.9 64.5% 63.3% 45.7% 55.2% 43.4% 57.0% 42.0% 2013 19/27 1.9 2.3 63.2% 61.4% 43.9% 45.3% 45.3% 55.3% 44.7%
31 2017 38/38 2.1 2.4 69.9% 60.4% 48.5% 47.0% 50.2% 56.9% 40.2% 2014 2/4 0.5 2.0 65.9% 56.8% 23.0% 63.9% 25.0% 45.3% 36.3%
32 2018 19/19 1.6 2.6 68.0% 58.5% 44.8% 56.1% 42.6% 53.9% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 12/12 1.2 2.6 63.6% 58.2% 37.6% 50.1% 46.0% 50.8% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 2/2 1.5 2.5 68.2% 52.0% 36.3% 51.9% 51.1% 47.2% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 8/8 1.9 2.0 66.5% 59.2% 44.8% 56.7% 35.9% 54.6% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 8/8 2.3 1.1 64.8% 61.3% 57.4% 54.5% 30.5% 59.9% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1/2 1.0 1.0 77.8% 62.5% 50.0% 60.0% 0.0% 59.7% 27.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2026 6/6 1.7 3.3 61.6% 67.3% 42.9% 49.5% 40.7% 57.8% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 344/377 2.0 2.8 66.4% 60.5% 46.7% 51.3% 45.3% 55.7% 41.3% — 326/588 1.2 1.5 64.9% 61.1% 48.0% 50.5% 50.6% 56.5% 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Anabel Medina Garrigues
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1482 95.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1495 109.4 — — — — — +46 — 37.5% -0.88 0–2 0–1 — -0.45
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1563 117.3 — — — — -85 +93 — 48.8% +0.08 4–10 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 93.0 +0.66
19 2005 1510 108.8 — — — — +23 — — 71.4% +1.43 0–1 1–0 — +0.39 2002 1688 129.0 — — — — -48 — — 75.0% +1.87 2–0 0–1 — +0.26
20 2006 1491 104.2 -2.19 -2.82 0.768 44.5% +4 — — 30.0% -0.75 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.12 2003 1613 108.3 — — — — 0 +20 — 49.2% +0.02 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 102.6 +1.71
21 2007 1452 106.5 -3.00 -3.30 0.753 44.4% +14 +82 — 27.6% -1.72 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.51 2004 1708 129.8 +1.41 +0.60 1.118 51.8% -57 +9 -121 53.7% +0.07 6–8 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 98.9 -1.46
22 2008 1449 99.7 -0.21 -4.92 0.705 44.7% +22 +58 — 33.3% -1.08 — — — +0.44 2005 1745 135.2 -1.51 +1.69 0.965 49.2% -99 +158 -209 53.6% +0.26 6–6 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.7 -2.02
23 2009 1456 112.8 +0.34 -2.03 0.939 48.7% -40 +79 — 37.5% -0.85 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 96.2 -0.04 2006 1689 128.8 -1.72 -0.23 0.958 49.1% -75 +209 -104 55.6% +0.38 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 +2.64
24 2010 1470 112.5 -1.47 -1.40 0.925 48.1% -77 +74 — 41.9% -0.77 0–5 (0%) 2–0 — +0.15 2007 1682 135.1 +0.95 +0.79 1.039 50.5% -106 +315 — 53.6% +0.32 7–11 (39%) 8–3 (73%) 98.9 +0.01
25 2011 1509 110.7 -2.49 +0.09 0.889 47.1% -86 +42 — 36.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 101.3 -0.38 2008 1820 137.4 +2.98 +3.19 1.133 52.6% -59 +96 -278 58.5% +0.61 11–11 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 97.9 -0.46
26 2012 1712 134.0 +1.37 -1.53 0.982 49.5% -96 -36 -106 55.4% +0.30 9–6 (60%) 8–8 (50%) 109.1 +1.09 2009 1684 126.3 +0.93 +1.02 1.069 51.3% -23 +170 -48 52.7% +0.20 11–6 (65%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 +2.67
27 2013 1607 133.5 -0.39 -0.95 0.948 48.8% -50 +122 — 43.2% -0.48 6–11 (35%) 6–5 (55%) 100.0 +0.01 2010 1568 122.5 -1.00 +1.31 1.018 50.4% -21 +188 — 44.7% -0.10 4–8 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.63
28 2014 1754 139.8 +1.35 +1.85 1.057 51.0% -27 -11 -174 55.0% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 105.6 +0.56 2011 1783 138.0 +2.59 +4.74 1.189 53.8% -112 +101 — 61.8% +0.86 2–8 (20%) 6–7 (46%) 94.4 -1.92
29 2015 1637 128.4 -0.98 -0.70 0.925 48.4% +64 -24 -123 44.7% -0.36 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 96.0 +1.03 2012 1619 120.1 +0.13 -0.99 0.970 49.5% -31 +157 -55 49.1% +0.03 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 97.5 +1.56
30 2016 1608 123.0 +0.49 -0.93 0.978 49.5% +29 +2 -112 46.1% -0.30 7–9 (44%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -0.47 2013 1542 118.6 -0.14 +0.99 1.001 49.5% -27 +153 -29 38.7% -0.87 2–10 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 91.4 -1.16
31 2017 1706 124.1 +0.80 -2.00 0.932 48.5% -5 -69 -238 47.4% -0.55 8–11 (42%) 11–3 (79%) 103.5 -2.00 2014 1491 90.1 -2.24 -1.41 0.663 41.1% — — — 11.1% -3.22 0–1 — — +0.24
32 2018 1631 122.6 -1.36 -1.05 0.877 47.4% +16 -20 — 39.1% -1.02 2–6 (25%) 5–5 (50%) 96.5 -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1523 100.7 -2.66 -3.16 0.762 44.4% +1 -2 — 23.1% -1.85 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1483 108.5 -2.16 -1.70 0.843 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1583 103.2 -1.31 -3.66 0.835 46.7% +24 -127 — 35.3% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.2 +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1611 105.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1639 109.6 +0.88 -1.47 1.034 48.3% +66 — — 31.3% -1.19 1–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1606 101.7 +0.56 +1.40 0.687 44.5% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2026 1515 108.8 -0.01 -2.17 0.973 49.3% — +67 — 37.5% -0.44 2–2 (50%) — — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1803 126.0 -0.15 -1.09 0.934 48.5% -13 +21 -156 43.8% -0.47 60–82 (42%) 58–52 (53%) 102.1 +0.09 — 1834 132.6 +0.82 +1.48 1.053 51.0% -62 +135 -114 52.6% +0.21 79–99 (44%) 54–55 (50%) 94.1 +0.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.