H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC

Varvara Lepchenko vs Christina Mchale H2H: 3-1

Varvara Lepchenko holds a 3–1 lead over Christina Mchale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Varvara Lepchenko leads 2–0 on clay, while Christina Mchale leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Varvara Lepchenko won the 2014 Seoul semifinal 3-6 6-1 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Varvara Lepchenko
USA Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Christina Mchale
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 12, 2018 Cincinnati WTA 1000 Q2 Q Hard Varvara Lepchenko #105 6-3 2-6 6-2 Christina Mchale #98 Match data
Sep 20, 2014* Seoul WTA 250 SF Hard Varvara Lepchenko #43 3-6 6-1 7-6(5) Christina Mchale #57 Match data
Apr 3, 2013* Charleston WTA 500 R64 Clay Varvara Lepchenko #27 6-3 4-6 6-2 Christina Mchale #55 Match data
Feb 9, 2012* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Christina Mchale #38 6-4 7-5 Varvara Lepchenko #113 Match data
May 25, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Varvara Lepchenko #127 7-5 6-3 Christina Mchale #165 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Varvara Lepchenko #172 #19 1,875 1,804 155 220 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christina Mchale #319 #24 1,935 1,803 166 207 44.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Christina Mchale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — 2009 1–2 33.3% #231 1,499 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2010 8–9 47.1% #109 1,556 0 0
19 2005 2–1 66.7% #132 1,510 0 0 2011 19–17 52.8% #43 1,716 0 0
20 2006 2–6 25.0% #98 1,491 0 0 2012 21–20 51.2% #33 1,676 0 0
21 2007 2–10 16.7% #139 1,452 0 0 2013 13–18 41.9% #66 1,636 0 0
22 2008 2–4 33.3% #121 1,449 0 0 2014 20–21 48.8% #52 1,647 0 0
23 2009 5–12 29.4% #102 1,456 0 0 2015 18–21 46.2% #63 1,635 0 0
24 2010 4–10 28.6% #74 1,469 0 0 2016 24–21 53.3% #45 1,698 0 1
25 2011 6–12 33.3% #127 1,509 0 0 2017 19–26 42.2% #64 1,690 0 1
26 2012 24–19 55.8% #21 1,717 0 0 2018 8–17 32.0% #151 1,568 0 1
27 2013 16–25 39.0% #54 1,613 0 0 2019 7–10 41.2% #88 1,652 0 1
28 2014 27–19 58.7% #35 1,756 0 0 2020 6–8 42.9% #81 1,675 0 1
29 2015 17–22 43.6% #47 1,636 0 0 2021 2–16 11.1% #159 1,524 0 1
30 2016 15–17 46.9% #90 1,604 0 0 2022 0–1 0.0% #319 1,452 0 1
31 2017 17–21 44.7% #63 1,704 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #129 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2019 2–11 15.4% #173 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–2 0.0% #181 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2021 3–5 37.5% #127 1,584 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2024 3–5 37.5% #129 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
39 2025 0–2 0.0% #147 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
40 2026 2–3 40.0% #172 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —