H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Varvara Lepchenko vs Jelena Jankovic H2H: 2-0
Varvara Lepchenko holds a 2–0 lead over Jelena Jankovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Varvara Lepchenko leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Varvara Lepchenko won the 2014 Miami second round 6-3 2-6 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 40
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2014* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Varvara Lepchenko | 6-3 2-6 7-6(2) | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| May 30, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Varvara Lepchenko | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Varvara Lepchenko | #172 | #19 | 1,875 | 1,804 | 155 | 220 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Varvara Lepchenko | Jelena Jankovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #132 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2006 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2007 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2009 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #102 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 2010 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #74 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2012 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2013 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #54 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #35 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 2015 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #47 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 2016 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #90 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #129 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 |
| 33 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #173 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #127 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2026 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |