H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Varvara Lepchenko vs Lesia Tsurenko H2H: 5-1

Varvara Lepchenko holds a 5–1 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Varvara Lepchenko leads 4–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Varvara Lepchenko won the 2017 Beijing second round 5-7 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Varvara Lepchenko
USA Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Lesia Tsurenko
UKR Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 2, 2017 Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Varvara Lepchenko #67 5-7 6-4 6-2 Lesia Tsurenko #51 Match data
Jan 20, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Varvara Lepchenko #51 6-7 6-2 6-3 Lesia Tsurenko #35 Match data
Sep 3, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Varvara Lepchenko #46 7-6(7) 6-2 Lesia Tsurenko #37 Match data
May 21, 2015* Strasbourg WTA 500 R32 Clay Lesia Tsurenko #67 6-4 7-6(4) Varvara Lepchenko #34 Match data
Jan 15, 2014* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Varvara Lepchenko #50 2-6 6-3 6-4 Lesia Tsurenko #96 Match data
May 15, 2013* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Varvara Lepchenko #31 6-4 6-2 Lesia Tsurenko #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Varvara Lepchenko #172 #19 1,875 1,804 155 220 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lesia Tsurenko #370 #23 2,030 1,889 180 200 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Lesia Tsurenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 2–1 66.7% #132 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 2–6 25.0% #98 1,491 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0
21 2007 2–10 16.7% #139 1,452 0 0 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0
22 2008 2–4 33.3% #121 1,449 0 0 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0
23 2009 5–12 29.4% #102 1,456 0 0 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,485 0 0
24 2010 4–10 28.6% #74 1,469 0 0 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,507 0 0
25 2011 6–12 33.3% #127 1,509 0 0 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,511 0 0
26 2012 24–19 55.8% #21 1,717 0 0 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,738 0 1
27 2013 16–25 39.0% #54 1,613 0 0 2016 19–19 50.0% #57 1,728 0 2
28 2014 27–19 58.7% #35 1,756 0 0 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,699 0 3
29 2015 17–22 43.6% #47 1,636 0 0 2018 26–18 59.1% #27 1,814 0 4
30 2016 15–17 46.9% #90 1,604 0 0 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,734 0 4
31 2017 17–21 44.7% #63 1,704 0 0 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,746 0 4
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #129 1,630 0 0 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,738 0 4
33 2019 2–11 15.4% #173 1,526 0 0 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,745 0 4
34 2020 0–2 0.0% #181 1,484 0 0 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,866 0 4
35 2021 3–5 37.5% #127 1,584 0 0 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,693 0 4
38 2024 3–5 37.5% #129 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
39 2025 0–2 0.0% #147 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
40 2026 2–3 40.0% #172 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —