H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Varvara Lepchenko vs Monica Puig H2H: 0-1

Monica Puig holds a 1–0 lead over Varvara Lepchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monica Puig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Puig won the 2016 Pan Pacific Open first round 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Varvara Lepchenko
United States Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Monica Puig
PUR Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monica Puig #33 6-0 6-3 Varvara Lepchenko #79 Match data Sep 22, 2016* R32 Pan Pacific Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Varvara Lepchenko #181 #19 1,875 1,802 156 220 41.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Monica Puig #1,073 #27 1,570 1,843 139 140 49.8% 0 1 0 0 0 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Monica Puig
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #211 1,492 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
19 2005 2–1 66.7% #132 1,509 0 0 2013 13–15 46.4% #56 1,570 0 0
20 2006 2–6 25.0% #98 1,491 0 0 2014 16–18 47.1% #59 1,614 0 1
21 2007 2–10 16.7% #139 1,452 0 0 2015 15–23 39.5% #92 1,578 0 1
22 2008 2–4 33.3% #121 1,448 0 0 2016 41–24 63.1% #32 1,770 0 2
23 2009 5–12 29.4% #102 1,456 0 0 2017 20–21 48.8% #58 1,724 0 2
24 2010 4–10 28.6% #74 1,469 0 0 2018 18–14 56.2% #53 1,780 0 2
25 2011 6–12 33.3% #127 1,508 0 0 2019 16–19 45.7% #79 1,686 0 2
26 2012 25–20 55.6% #21 1,712 0 0 2020 0–2 0.0% #105 1,623 0 2
27 2013 16–25 39.0% #54 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2014 27–19 58.7% #35 1,753 0 0 2022 0–1 0.0% #1073 1,619 0 2
29 2015 17–22 43.6% #47 1,637 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2016 15–17 46.9% #90 1,608 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2017 17–21 44.7% #63 1,705 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #129 1,631 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2019 2–10 16.7% #173 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–2 0.0% #181 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2021 3–5 37.5% #127 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2024 3–5 37.5% #129 1,638 0 0 — — — — — — —
39 2025 0–2 0.0% #147 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
40 2026 2–3 40.0% #181 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Monica Puig
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 5 11 16 31.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
20 2006 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 9 12 21 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
21 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
22 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2016 25 14 39 64.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
23 2009 0 6 6 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 2017 17 15 32 53.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2010 0 5 5 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2018 17 12 29 58.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 7 13 20 35.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2012 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2013 7 17 24 29.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 20 12 32 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2015 16 13 29 55.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 10 13 23 43.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2026 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 95 131 226 42.0% 50 63 113 44.2% 11 25 36 30.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — 91 94 185 49.2% 34 30 64 53.1% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 343/373 of Varvara Lepchenko's and 252/279 of Monica Puig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Monica Puig
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 2.0 7.0 59.8% 64.5% 41.2% 53.8% 50.0% 55.1% 45.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 1/2 4.0 3.0 50.0% 62.5% 53.1% 75.0% 0.0% 57.8% 30.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 27/28 2.7 2.7 62.4% 62.4% 51.4% 41.8% 51.2% 58.1% 43.0%
20 2006 6/8 0.8 4.0 64.2% 50.1% 45.8% 48.2% 45.8% 49.2% 39.0% 2014 33/34 3.1 4.4 59.8% 66.4% 46.7% 51.1% 46.9% 58.4% 42.7%
21 2007 11/12 1.6 3.0 70.2% 56.8% 37.3% 52.7% 47.3% 50.7% 37.1% 2015 32/38 4.4 4.0 60.7% 65.2% 51.0% 50.2% 49.1% 59.4% 38.4%
22 2008 3/6 1.3 2.0 63.0% 53.9% 56.6% 58.3% 16.7% 55.1% 31.7% 2016 52/65 3.1 3.6 62.0% 64.8% 49.8% 58.7% 46.5% 59.0% 44.7%
23 2009 15/17 1.2 2.5 70.0% 59.4% 49.2% 53.3% 49.4% 55.7% 41.6% 2017 39/41 3.3 3.4 60.1% 65.6% 47.8% 54.0% 45.1% 58.7% 42.8%
24 2010 13/14 2.8 2.8 63.9% 59.9% 45.7% 44.4% 44.4% 54.9% 41.7% 2018 31/32 3.0 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 45.7% 52.7% 48.6% 58.6% 42.1%
25 2011 17/18 2.0 3.6 66.2% 56.3% 43.0% 48.5% 48.8% 51.6% 43.0% 2019 33/35 3.3 3.6 62.5% 66.1% 48.0% 60.1% 51.9% 59.1% 44.1%
26 2012 42/45 2.6 3.0 63.3% 63.2% 48.3% 51.9% 50.2% 57.7% 41.5% 2020 2/2 1.5 6.0 64.6% 55.7% 28.2% 29.8% 28.6% 46.0% 34.8%
27 2013 37/41 2.0 3.3 65.0% 60.6% 45.5% 49.4% 42.0% 55.3% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 43/46 1.9 2.9 67.1% 62.3% 47.9% 56.8% 47.8% 57.6% 44.8% 2022 1/1 0.0 5.0 60.3% 51.2% 33.3% 53.8% 33.3% 44.1% 32.7%
29 2015 31/39 2.2 2.8 69.3% 59.5% 51.1% 44.3% 43.0% 56.4% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 32/32 2.6 2.9 64.5% 63.3% 45.7% 55.2% 43.4% 57.0% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 38/38 2.1 2.4 69.9% 60.4% 48.5% 47.0% 50.2% 56.9% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 19/19 1.6 2.6 68.0% 58.5% 44.8% 56.1% 42.6% 53.9% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 12/12 1.2 2.6 63.6% 58.2% 37.6% 50.1% 46.0% 50.8% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 2/2 1.5 2.5 68.2% 52.0% 36.3% 51.9% 51.1% 47.2% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 8/8 1.9 2.0 66.5% 59.2% 44.8% 56.7% 35.9% 54.6% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 8/8 2.3 1.1 64.8% 61.3% 57.4% 54.5% 30.5% 59.9% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1/2 1.0 1.0 77.8% 62.5% 50.0% 60.0% 0.0% 59.7% 27.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2026 5/6 1.8 2.6 61.9% 65.6% 41.1% 54.4% 35.5% 56.1% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 343/377 2.0 2.8 66.5% 60.4% 46.7% 51.4% 45.2% 55.7% 41.3% — 252/279 3.2 3.6 61.2% 65.2% 48.4% 53.3% 47.8% 58.6% 42.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Monica Puig
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1482 95.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1492 103.5 -1.04 -2.47 1.020 50.6% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.15
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1464 94.8 -3.46 -3.96 0.711 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17
19 2005 1510 108.8 — — — — +23 — — 71.4% +1.43 0–1 1–0 — +0.39 2013 1571 123.3 +1.46 -0.93 1.027 50.5% -93 +68 +69 50.0% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) 101.7 +0.09
20 2006 1491 104.2 -2.19 -2.82 0.768 44.5% +4 — — 30.0% -0.75 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.12 2014 1615 129.5 +1.33 -0.33 1.027 50.6% -75 +119 0 48.7% +0.15 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 102.0 -0.29
21 2007 1452 106.5 -3.00 -3.30 0.753 44.4% +14 +82 — 27.6% -1.72 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.51 2015 1579 121.9 +0.62 -2.26 0.948 49.1% +9 +55 -13 42.4% -0.19 3–8 (27%) 5–11 (31%) 91.9 -0.38
22 2008 1449 99.7 -0.21 -4.92 0.705 44.7% +22 +58 — 33.3% -1.08 — — — +0.44 2016 1771 137.9 +2.19 +1.46 1.092 52.0% -9 -57 -89 58.9% +0.70 12–5 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 108.8 -0.14
23 2009 1456 112.8 +0.34 -2.03 0.939 48.7% -40 +79 — 37.5% -0.85 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 96.2 -0.04 2017 1724 133.3 +2.17 -0.36 1.036 50.7% +15 -63 — 47.4% -0.04 8–9 (47%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 -0.88
24 2010 1470 112.5 -1.47 -1.40 0.925 48.1% -77 +74 — 41.9% -0.77 0–5 (0%) 2–0 — +0.15 2018 1780 137.8 +0.96 +0.23 1.017 50.5% +6 — — 56.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.8 -0.76
25 2011 1509 110.7 -2.49 +0.09 0.889 47.1% -86 +42 — 36.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 101.3 -0.38 2019 1686 127.3 +1.69 +0.90 1.076 51.5% -34 +39 -64 50.0% +0.35 4–8 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 92.6 -0.89
26 2012 1712 134.0 +1.37 -1.53 0.982 49.5% -96 -36 -106 55.4% +0.30 9–6 (60%) 8–8 (50%) 109.1 +1.09 2020 1624 94.4 -0.47 -3.91 0.644 40.5% — — — 20.0% -3.40 0–1 1–0 — +0.30
27 2013 1607 133.5 -0.39 -0.95 0.948 48.8% -50 +122 — 43.2% -0.48 6–11 (35%) 6–5 (55%) 100.0 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1754 139.8 +1.35 +1.85 1.057 51.0% -27 -11 -174 55.0% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 105.6 +0.56 2022 1619 101.3 +0.44 +1.01 0.584 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.14
29 2015 1637 128.4 -0.98 -0.70 0.925 48.4% +64 -24 -123 44.7% -0.36 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 96.0 +1.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1608 123.0 +0.49 -0.93 0.978 49.5% +29 +2 -112 46.1% -0.30 7–9 (44%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1706 124.1 +0.80 -2.00 0.932 48.5% -5 -69 -238 47.4% -0.55 8–11 (42%) 11–3 (79%) 103.5 -2.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1631 122.6 -1.36 -1.05 0.877 47.4% +16 -20 — 39.1% -1.02 2–6 (25%) 5–5 (50%) 96.5 -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1523 100.7 -2.66 -3.16 0.762 44.4% +1 -2 — 23.1% -1.85 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1483 108.5 -2.16 -1.70 0.843 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1583 103.2 -1.31 -3.66 0.835 46.7% +24 -127 — 35.3% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.2 +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1611 105.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1639 109.6 +0.88 -1.47 1.034 48.3% +66 — — 31.3% -1.19 1–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1606 101.7 +0.56 +1.40 0.687 44.5% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2026 1526 107.9 -0.55 -2.09 0.933 48.6% — +56 — 38.5% -0.54 2–1 (67%) — — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1803 125.9 -0.16 -1.09 0.933 48.5% -13 +21 -156 43.9% -0.47 60–81 (43%) 58–52 (53%) 102.3 +0.05 — 1843 134.9 +1.52 -0.09 1.029 50.7% -18 +21 -39 50.3% +0.16 40–50 (44%) 29–34 (46%) 100.5 -1.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.