H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC

Varvara Lepchenko vs Shuai Peng H2H: 2-2

Varvara Lepchenko and Shuai Peng are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Shuai Peng leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Varvara Lepchenko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2019 US Open first round 6-2 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Varvara Lepchenko
USA Age 40 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 28, 2019* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Shuai Peng #167 6-2 7-6(5) Varvara Lepchenko #118 Match data
Aug 31, 2016* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Varvara Lepchenko #68 4-6 7-6(9) 6-3 Shuai Peng #259 Match data
May 14, 2014* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Varvara Lepchenko #49 6-1 6-0 Shuai Peng #39 Match data
Aug 31, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Shuai Peng #14 6-3 6-4 Varvara Lepchenko #101 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Varvara Lepchenko #172 #19 1,875 1,804 155 220 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Varvara Lepchenko Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 2005 2–1 66.7% #132 1,510 0 0 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0
20 2006 2–6 25.0% #98 1,491 0 0 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0
21 2007 2–10 16.7% #139 1,452 0 0 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0
22 2008 2–4 33.3% #121 1,449 0 0 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0
23 2009 5–12 29.4% #102 1,456 0 0 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0
24 2010 4–10 28.6% #74 1,469 0 0 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0
25 2011 6–12 33.3% #127 1,509 0 0 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0
26 2012 24–19 55.8% #21 1,717 0 0 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0
27 2013 16–25 39.0% #54 1,613 0 0 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0
28 2014 27–19 58.7% #35 1,756 0 0 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0
29 2015 17–22 43.6% #47 1,636 0 0 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0
30 2016 15–17 46.9% #90 1,604 0 0 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1
31 2017 17–21 44.7% #63 1,704 0 0 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2
32 2018 6–13 31.6% #129 1,630 0 0 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2
33 2019 2–11 15.4% #173 1,526 0 0 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2
34 2020 0–2 0.0% #181 1,484 0 0 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2
35 2021 3–5 37.5% #127 1,584 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2024 3–5 37.5% #129 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
39 2025 0–2 0.0% #147 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
40 2026 2–3 40.0% #172 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —