H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Varvara Lepchenko vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 1-1
Varvara Lepchenko and Yanina Wickmayer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yanina Wickmayer leads 1–0 on grass, while Varvara Lepchenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Varvara Lepchenko won the 2014 Miami first round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 40
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 36
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2014* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Varvara Lepchenko | 7-5 6-1 | Yanina Wickmayer | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Yanina Wickmayer | 7-5 6-3 | Varvara Lepchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Varvara Lepchenko | #172 | #19 | 1,875 | 1,804 | 155 | 220 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yanina Wickmayer | #765 | #12 | 3,320 | 1,932 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Varvara Lepchenko | Yanina Wickmayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #132 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2006 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2007 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #23 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2009 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #102 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #51 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2010 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #74 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #75 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #41 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2012 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #58 | 1,574 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2013 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #54 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,624 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #35 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #122 | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2015 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #47 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #152 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2016 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #90 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #129 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #321 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #173 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,530 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #127 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,500 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2026 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |