H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 4-0

Venus Williams holds a 4–0 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2012 Cincinnati second round 6-3 6-7(5) 6-2.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 0
4 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 15, 2012* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Venus Williams #64 6-3 6-7(5) 6-2 Maria Kirilenko #14 Match data
Sep 30, 2007* Seoul WTA 250 F Hard Venus Williams #9 6-3 1-6 6-4 Maria Kirilenko #29 Match data
Mar 21, 2007* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Venus Williams #39 6-3 6-3 Maria Kirilenko #34 Match data
Sep 1, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Venus Williams #10 6-1 6-3 Maria Kirilenko #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,910 282 228 55.3% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Maria Kirilenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,741 0 1
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,656 0 1
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,722 0 5
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,719 0 5
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,827 0 5
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,816 0 5
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2012 29–20 59.2% #14 1,775 0 5
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,786 0 6
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,698 0 6
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47