H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Vera Dushevina vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 2-3

Maria Kirilenko holds a 3–2 lead over Vera Dushevina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Maria Kirilenko leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Vera Dushevina leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2011 US Open second round 6-1 6-2.

RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Maria Kirilenko #29 6-1 6-2 Vera Dushevina #72 Match data
Oct 23, 2010* Moscow WTA 500 SF Hard Maria Kirilenko #24 6-1 6-1 Vera Dushevina #53 Match data
Sep 26, 2009* Seoul WTA 250 QF Hard Maria Kirilenko #54 7-5 7-6(5) Vera Dushevina #50 Match data
Jun 25, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Vera Dushevina #63 6-3 6-3 Maria Kirilenko #19 Match data
Sep 28, 2006* Seoul WTA 250 R32 Hard Vera Dushevina #82 6-3 5-7 7-5 Maria Kirilenko #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Dushevina #741 #31 1,490 1,786 143 172 45.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,910 282 228 55.3% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Dushevina Maria Kirilenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 0–1 0.0% #473 1,485 0 0 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0
16 2003 5–4 55.6% #113 1,552 0 0 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0
17 2004 12–16 42.9% #63 1,590 0 0 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0
18 2005 19–19 50.0% #40 1,657 0 0 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,741 0 1
19 2006 12–22 35.3% #97 1,609 0 0 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,656 0 1
20 2007 19–15 55.9% #40 1,747 0 0 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2
21 2008 12–17 41.4% #89 1,681 0 0 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,722 0 5
22 2009 24–18 57.1% #43 1,762 0 1 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,719 0 5
23 2010 19–19 50.0% #54 1,757 0 1 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,827 0 5
24 2011 12–17 41.4% #86 1,724 0 1 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,816 0 5
25 2012 5–15 25.0% #146 1,534 0 1 2012 29–20 59.2% #14 1,775 0 5
26 2013 4–8 33.3% #124 1,554 0 1 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,786 0 6
27 2014 0–1 0.0% #463 1,541 0 1 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,698 0 6