H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 10:32 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 2-4

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 4–2 lead over Vera Zvonareva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2011 WTA Championships round-robin match 1-6 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Agnieszka Radwanska
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 24, 2011 WTA Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #8 1-6 6-2 7-5 Vera Zvonareva #6 Match data
Oct 2, 2011* Tokyo WTA 1000 F Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #13 6-3 6-2 Vera Zvonareva #4 Match data
Aug 8, 2011 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #12 6-4 7-6(4) Vera Zvonareva #3 Match data
Aug 7, 2011* San Diego WTA 500 F Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #13 6-3 6-4 Vera Zvonareva #3 Match data
Mar 26, 2011* Miami WTA 1000 QF Hard Vera Zvonareva #3 7-5 6-3 Agnieszka Radwanska #14 Match data
Oct 12, 2007* Moscow WTA 1000 R16 Hard Vera Zvonareva #24 6-2 6-2 Agnieszka Radwanska #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,081 506 237 68.1% 0 5 1 8 6 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Agnieszka Radwanska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,673 0 0
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,808 0 1
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 2008 51–19 72.9% #10 1,926 0 4
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,910 0 4
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,860 0 4
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,979 0 7
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 2012 59–19 75.6% #4 1,994 0 10
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,957 0 13
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,872 0 14
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,957 0 17
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2016 51–18 73.9% #3 1,942 0 20
28 — — — — — — — 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 20
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2018 11–13 45.8% #74 1,727 0 20
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —