H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Anastasia Rodionova H2H: 3-1

Vera Zvonareva holds a 3–1 lead over Anastasia Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Vera Zvonareva leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vera Zvonareva won the 2011 Roland Garros third round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Anastasia Rodionova
AUS Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 19, 2017 New Haven WTA 500 Q1 Q Hard Vera Zvonareva #743 2-6 6-3 6-1 Anastasia Rodionova #385 Match data
May 28, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Vera Zvonareva #3 6-2 6-3 Anastasia Rodionova #74 Match data
May 26, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Anastasia Rodionova #92 6-4 6-4 Vera Zvonareva #22 Match data
Sep 18, 2008* Guangzhou WTA 500 R32 Hard Vera Zvonareva #9 6-1 6-2 Anastasia Rodionova #75 Match data
Feb 20, 2008* Doha WTA 1000 R64 Hard Vera Zvonareva #27 6-0 6-3 Anastasia Rodionova #86 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,649 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Anastasia Rodionova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,468 0 0
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,521 0 0
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,546 0 0
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,530 0 0
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,517 0 0
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,526 0 0
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,525 0 0
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,503 0 0
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,522 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,606 0 0
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,573 0 0
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,539 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,502 0 0
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,514 0 0
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,476 0 0
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,485 0 0
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —