H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Na Li H2H: 3-4

Na Li holds a 4–3 lead over Vera Zvonareva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 4–3 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2014 Shenzhen third round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 2, 2014* Shenzhen WTA 250 R32 Hard Na Li #3 7-5 6-3 Vera Zvonareva #400 Match data
Oct 9, 2010* Beijing WTA 1000 SF Hard Vera Zvonareva #4 6-3 6-3 Na Li #15 Match data
Mar 26, 2009* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Na Li #40 6-4 3-6 6-2 Vera Zvonareva #5 Match data
Mar 13, 2009* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Vera Zvonareva #6 6-4 6-4 Na Li #45 Match data
Feb 23, 2008* Doha WTA 1000 SF Hard Vera Zvonareva #27 3-6 6-3 6-3 Na Li #29 Match data
Mar 10, 2007* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Na Li #17 6-4 7-5 Vera Zvonareva #20 Match data
Mar 2, 2006* Doha WTA 500 R32 Hard Na Li #71 6-4 6-4 Vera Zvonareva #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6
31 — — — — — — — 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —