H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Veronika Kudermetova vs Elena Vesnina H2H: 1-0
Veronika Kudermetova holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Vesnina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Veronika Kudermetova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Veronika Kudermetova won the 2021 Madrid second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2021* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Veronika Kudermetova | 6-1 6-4 | Elena Vesnina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veronika Kudermetova | #125 | #9 | 2,950 | 1,976 | 205 | 152 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Elena Vesnina | #573 | #13 | 3,320 | 1,858 | 262 | 260 | 50.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Veronika Kudermetova | Elena Vesnina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #47 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #54 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #133 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #79 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #23 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #46 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #57 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2024 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #72 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #64 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #115 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #16 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #18 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #137 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #310 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |