H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Ana Ivanovic H2H: 5-3

Victoria Azarenka holds a 5–3 lead over Ana Ivanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Victoria Azarenka leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2014 Tokyo fourth round 6-3 6-4.

BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
SRB Age 38 Right-Handed 184 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 19, 2014* Tokyo WTA 500 R16 Hard Ana Ivanovic #10 6-3 6-4 Victoria Azarenka #25 Match data
Sep 3, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #2 4-6 6-3 6-4 Ana Ivanovic #15 Match data
Aug 3, 2013* Carlsbad WTA 500 SF Hard Victoria Azarenka #3 6-0 4-6 6-3 Ana Ivanovic #17 Match data
Jul 4, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Victoria Azarenka #2 6-1 6-0 Ana Ivanovic #14 Match data
May 11, 2012* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Victoria Azarenka #1 6-4 6-4 Ana Ivanovic #15 Match data
Aug 11, 2010* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Ana Ivanovic #62 2-6 7-6(6) 6-2 Victoria Azarenka #12 Match data
May 6, 2010* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Ana Ivanovic #58 6-4 6-4 Victoria Azarenka #10 Match data
Jun 2, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Victoria Azarenka #9 6-2 6-3 Ana Ivanovic #8 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Ana Ivanovic #63 #1 6,912 2,095 419 213 66.3% 1 3 2 7 2 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Ana Ivanovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 2004 3–4 42.9% #101 1,544 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 2005 32–14 69.6% #16 1,847 0 1
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2006 36–18 66.7% #14 1,900 0 2
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2007 49–17 74.2% #4 2,034 0 5
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2008 38–16 70.4% #5 1,975 1 8
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2009 22–14 61.1% #21 1,825 1 8
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2010 33–18 64.7% #17 1,938 1 10
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2011 32–20 61.5% #22 1,877 1 11
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2012 33–18 64.7% #13 1,872 1 11
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2013 38–23 62.3% #16 1,855 1 11
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2014 59–18 76.6% #5 2,019 1 15
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2015 29–19 60.4% #16 1,857 1 15
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2016 15–14 51.7% #63 1,702 1 15
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21