H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Victoria Azarenka vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 1-2
Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 2–1 lead over Victoria Azarenka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2008 Zurich quarterfinal 4-6 6-3 0-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2008* | Zurich | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Anabel Medina Garrigues | 4-6 6-3 0-0 (ret.) | Victoria Azarenka | Match data |
| Mar 21, 2007* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Victoria Azarenka | 6-4 7-5 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data |
| May 30, 2006* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Anabel Medina Garrigues | 0-6 6-3 9-7 | Victoria Azarenka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Azarenka | #449 | #1 | 10,955 | 2,203 | 575 | 266 | 68.4% | 2 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 21 |
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | #741 | #16 | 2,505 | 1,852 | 310 | 275 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Victoria Azarenka | Anabel Medina Garrigues | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #30 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2009 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 9–3 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2010 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2011 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #3 | 2,003 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #39 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2012 | 64–11 | 85.3% | #1 | 2,134 | 1 | 14 | 2005 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2013 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #2 | 2,068 | 2 | 17 | 2006 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,946 | 2 | 17 | 2007 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2015 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #22 | 1,954 | 2 | 17 | 2008 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2016 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #13 | 1,979 | 2 | 20 | 2009 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,683 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2017 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #205 | 1,962 | 2 | 20 | 2010 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #71 | 1,565 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2018 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #51 | 1,873 | 2 | 20 | 2011 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2019 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #50 | 1,846 | 2 | 20 | 2012 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #50 | 1,629 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2020 | 19–6 | 76.0% | #13 | 1,966 | 2 | 21 | 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,553 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2021 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #27 | 1,977 | 2 | 21 | 2014 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,501 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 2022 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #26 | 1,921 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #22 | 1,779 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,895 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,828 | 2 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |