H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Anna Chakvetadze H2H: 3-2

Victoria Azarenka holds a 3–2 lead over Anna Chakvetadze in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2009 Cincinnati third round 6-4 6-2.

BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 13, 2009* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #9 6-4 6-2 Anna Chakvetadze #51 Match data
Mar 26, 2009* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #10 6-1 6-4 Anna Chakvetadze #23 Match data
May 8, 2008* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Victoria Azarenka #26 1-6 7-6(1) 6-4 Anna Chakvetadze #7 Match data
Jun 21, 2007* 's-Hertogenbosch WTA 500 R32 Grass Anna Chakvetadze #8 5-7 6-2 6-2 Victoria Azarenka #52 Match data
Sep 2, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Anna Chakvetadze #29 6-4 6-3 Victoria Azarenka #124 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Anna Chakvetadze #577 #5 2,940 2,067 183 135 57.5% 0 1 0 5 2 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Anna Chakvetadze
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #83 1,526 0 0
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2005 24–21 53.3% #32 1,716 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2006 37–20 64.9% #13 1,936 0 2
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2007 56–19 74.7% #6 1,984 0 6
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2008 26–23 53.1% #18 1,721 0 7
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2009 14–18 43.8% #67 1,711 0 7
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2010 18–15 54.5% #56 1,715 0 8
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2011 3–8 27.3% #234 1,641 0 8
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2012 3–8 27.3% #224 1,557 0 8
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21