H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Barbora Strycova H2H: 5-0

Victoria Azarenka holds a 5–0 lead over Barbora Strycova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 5–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2016 Australian Open fourth round 6-2 6-4.

BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 26, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #16 6-2 6-4 Barbora Strycova #48 Match data
Jan 24, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #44 6-4 6-4 Barbora Strycova #23 Match data
Jan 17, 2014* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Victoria Azarenka #2 6-1 6-4 Barbora Strycova #84 Match data
Oct 20, 2011* Luxembourg WTA 250 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #3 6-2 6-4 Barbora Strycova #44 Match data
Sep 3, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Victoria Azarenka #9 6-2 6-1 Barbora Strycova #117 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21
Barbora Strycova #430 #16 2,295 1,888 286 297 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Barbora Strycova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #142 1,485 0 0
18 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0 2004 14–15 48.3% #57 1,562 0 0
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3 2005 8–15 34.8% #137 1,490 0 0
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,477 0 0
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8 2007 2–5 28.6% #151 1,456 0 0
22 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14 2008 5–9 35.7% #75 1,512 0 0
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17 2009 13–20 39.4% #66 1,524 0 0
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17 2010 16–22 42.1% #67 1,591 0 0
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17 2011 24–26 48.0% #44 1,631 0 1
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20 2012 13–21 38.2% #89 1,564 0 1
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20 2013 5–6 45.5% #94 1,584 0 1
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20 2014 29–23 55.8% #25 1,750 0 1
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20 2015 31–26 54.4% #42 1,710 0 1
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21 2016 35–23 60.3% #20 1,791 0 1
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21 2017 42–24 63.6% #23 1,868 0 2
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21 2018 23–22 51.1% #33 1,765 0 2
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21 2019 19–20 48.7% #33 1,713 0 2
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21 2020 5–9 35.7% #37 1,680 0 2
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21 2021 0–2 0.0% #340 1,650 0 2
37 2023 2–7 22.2% #430 1,602 0 2