H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Victoria Azarenka vs Caroline Wozniacki H2H: 7-5 (incl. walkovers)

Victoria Azarenka vs Caroline Wozniacki: 7–4 excluding walkovers; 7–5 including 1 walkover. Across 12 main-draw results including walkovers, they are tied 5–5 on hard courts, while Victoria Azarenka leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2015 Cincinnati Open second round 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Victoria Azarenka
Belarus Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H including walkovers
7 – 5
12 main-draw results
Caroline Wozniacki
Denmark Age 36 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Victoria Azarenka #21 6-0 6-4 Caroline Wozniacki #5 Match data Aug 20, 2015* R32 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Victoria Azarenka #29 6-2 7-6(2) Caroline Wozniacki #5 Match data May 14, 2015* R32 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Victoria Azarenka #48 6-3 6-1 Caroline Wozniacki #5 Match data Feb 27, 2015* QF Qatar Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Victoria Azarenka #44 6-4 6-2 Caroline Wozniacki #8 Match data Jan 22, 2015* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Victoria Azarenka #2 6-3 7-6(5) Caroline Wozniacki #10 Match data Aug 17, 2013* QF Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Caroline Wozniacki #10 (w/o) Victoria Azarenka #2 Match data Mar 13, 2013* QF Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Caroline Wozniacki #1 3-0 (ret.) Victoria Azarenka #9 Match data Mar 16, 2011* QF Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Caroline Wozniacki #2 6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 Victoria Azarenka #11 Match data Oct 1, 2010* SF Pan Pacific Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Caroline Wozniacki #4 1-6 6-4 7-5 Victoria Azarenka #6 Match data Oct 26, 2009 RR WTA Finals WTA Finals Hard
Victoria Azarenka #9 6-2 6-2 Caroline Wozniacki #11 Match data May 7, 2009* R16 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Victoria Azarenka #14 6-1 6-3 Caroline Wozniacki #12 Match data Feb 22, 2009* F Memphis International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Caroline Wozniacki #18 6-4 6-4 Victoria Azarenka #14 Match data Aug 31, 2008* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Victoria Azarenka #455 #1 10,955 2,249 582 268 68.5% 2 10 0 4 5 21
Caroline Wozniacki #289 #1 10,255 2,154 620 275 69.3% 1 6 1 11 11 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Victoria Azarenka Caroline Wozniacki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 0–2 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
15 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0 2006 4–4 50.0% #231 1,527 0 0
16 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0 2007 12–15 44.4% #60 1,555 0 0
17 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,816 0 0 2008 53–20 72.6% #12 1,913 0 3
18 2008 40–20 66.7% #15 1,872 0 0 2009 66–25 72.5% #4 1,898 0 6
19 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,940 0 3 2010 63–17 78.8% #1 2,105 0 12
20 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,948 0 5 2011 63–17 78.8% #1 1,988 0 18
21 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,020 0 8 2012 50–21 70.4% #10 1,975 0 20
22 2012 69–12 85.2% #1 2,178 1 14 2013 41–22 65.1% #10 1,906 0 21
23 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,126 2 17 2014 49–19 72.1% #8 2,014 0 22
24 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,980 2 17 2015 39–23 62.9% #17 1,817 0 23
25 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,985 2 17 2016 34–18 65.4% #19 1,912 0 25
26 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 2,046 2 20 2017 60–22 73.2% #3 2,004 0 27
27 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 2,018 2 20 2018 41–17 70.7% #3 1,947 1 30
28 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,892 2 20 2019 20–15 57.1% #38 1,845 1 30
29 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,853 2 20 2020 5–2 71.4% #36 1,852 1 30
30 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,959 2 21 — — — — — — —
31 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 2,010 2 21 — — — — — — —
32 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,941 2 21 2023 4–3 57.1% #249 1,862 1 30
33 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,802 2 21 2024 16–13 55.2% #70 1,845 1 30
34 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,900 2 21 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,831 2 21 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Victoria Azarenka Caroline Wozniacki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 2007 21 10 31 67.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2008 42 13 55 76.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
18 2008 22 11 33 66.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 35 18 53 66.0% 23 6 29 79.3% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
19 2009 32 10 42 76.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2010 45 9 54 83.3% 15 6 21 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
20 2010 32 12 44 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2011 40 11 51 78.4% 20 5 25 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
21 2011 32 12 44 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2012 42 14 56 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 2012 47 6 53 88.7% 12 4 16 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 2013 34 14 48 70.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
23 2013 32 8 40 80.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 42 15 57 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
24 2014 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 26 17 43 60.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
25 2015 19 9 28 67.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2016 31 14 45 68.9% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
26 2016 22 2 24 91.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 41 14 55 74.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
27 2017 — — — — — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2018 26 12 38 68.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
28 2018 14 7 21 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2019 12 9 21 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2019 12 11 23 52.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2020 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 15 4 19 78.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 19 9 28 67.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 18 11 29 62.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2023 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 17 14 31 54.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2024 10 7 17 58.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 2024 20 10 30 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 406 169 575 70.6% 116 66 182 63.7% 60 32 92 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — 447 188 635 70.4% 111 59 170 65.3% 62 28 90 68.9% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 743/846 of Victoria Azarenka's and 788/893 of Caroline Wozniacki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Victoria Azarenka Caroline Wozniacki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/8 2.7 2.3 65.7% 58.9% 51.0% 43.9% 42.3% 56.6% 49.3%
16 2006 9/21 3.4 3.3 58.1% 59.6% 40.0% 46.4% 50.1% 51.3% 43.7% 2007 18/27 1.1 3.2 67.3% 56.6% 40.0% 54.4% 45.4% 51.4% 41.8%
17 2007 37/46 2.3 4.0 59.8% 65.1% 46.3% 57.3% 47.8% 57.7% 47.3% 2008 63/73 2.1 2.1 65.9% 65.6% 50.8% 58.8% 54.4% 60.4% 49.1%
18 2008 49/60 2.2 2.8 67.1% 68.3% 46.8% 58.0% 54.3% 61.2% 49.5% 2009 86/91 2.0 1.7 68.9% 64.2% 50.0% 52.2% 49.6% 59.7% 48.6%
19 2009 55/60 1.5 3.2 71.8% 65.3% 45.5% 54.3% 55.0% 59.9% 51.5% 2010 71/80 1.8 1.9 68.9% 65.3% 50.2% 59.5% 50.1% 60.6% 48.1%
20 2010 53/62 1.5 3.8 70.6% 65.5% 44.8% 53.2% 57.4% 59.2% 50.1% 2011 73/80 1.6 1.6 70.6% 65.6% 51.4% 58.1% 53.0% 61.5% 51.1%
21 2011 66/73 1.3 3.2 70.3% 66.5% 47.4% 52.3% 49.7% 60.5% 50.6% 2012 60/71 1.8 1.6 66.8% 63.6% 51.4% 59.5% 52.9% 59.4% 47.5%
22 2012 65/81 1.7 4.1 67.6% 68.9% 48.0% 58.2% 54.9% 62.2% 52.6% 2013 56/63 1.5 1.8 69.1% 62.5% 50.3% 59.3% 54.1% 58.9% 47.5%
23 2013 50/55 1.6 4.9 66.9% 65.9% 41.8% 56.9% 54.0% 58.0% 54.1% 2014 61/68 2.3 2.6 69.6% 66.0% 48.0% 58.7% 53.3% 60.4% 48.1%
24 2014 22/24 2.9 6.0 67.5% 65.6% 39.5% 57.5% 52.4% 57.5% 45.7% 2015 51/62 2.0 1.9 69.9% 65.3% 52.6% 50.4% 51.3% 61.5% 46.7%
25 2015 39/45 2.4 4.4 70.2% 67.9% 48.3% 55.9% 56.0% 61.9% 48.2% 2016 44/52 2.1 2.1 67.7% 66.5% 46.3% 57.0% 56.3% 59.9% 47.8%
26 2016 27/29 2.4 4.4 65.4% 73.5% 46.9% 64.1% 51.5% 64.3% 52.3% 2017 76/82 2.6 2.2 67.6% 65.7% 49.4% 56.8% 51.6% 60.2% 47.8%
27 2017 6/6 3.0 4.3 64.3% 67.5% 49.0% 51.8% 37.2% 60.3% 42.9% 2018 50/58 3.0 2.5 64.9% 68.0% 48.4% 52.5% 54.9% 61.2% 48.3%
28 2018 28/29 2.6 4.0 66.8% 64.3% 42.7% 51.9% 51.6% 57.1% 46.6% 2019 35/35 2.8 1.8 65.3% 63.2% 50.1% 51.6% 50.7% 58.5% 44.4%
29 2019 38/38 3.2 4.2 61.4% 65.0% 44.4% 52.8% 47.9% 57.2% 47.2% 2020 7/7 3.1 1.3 70.4% 68.7% 54.5% 63.1% 43.8% 64.8% 49.2%
30 2020 24/25 2.7 2.5 69.0% 64.4% 45.7% 54.5% 52.5% 58.7% 48.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 36/43 3.0 4.7 62.5% 66.2% 44.5% 51.0% 51.2% 57.9% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 37/38 2.2 4.7 60.5% 67.3% 44.2% 51.0% 50.2% 57.8% 46.9% 2023 7/7 2.1 3.0 61.5% 67.5% 47.4% 57.7% 36.6% 59.6% 44.8%
33 2023 42/45 3.1 4.5 63.3% 68.1% 45.1% 51.9% 47.7% 59.4% 46.0% 2024 27/29 1.8 2.6 64.3% 65.3% 47.6% 55.5% 55.0% 59.1% 46.8%
34 2024 45/45 2.8 4.1 64.6% 67.2% 44.2% 61.4% 47.6% 59.0% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 15/21 2.7 4.1 62.3% 61.4% 43.3% 49.7% 57.0% 54.3% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 743/851 2.2 4.0 66.4% 66.6% 45.3% 55.1% 52.0% 59.4% 49.2% — 788/895 2.1 2.0 67.9% 65.0% 49.7% 56.4% 52.2% 60.0% 47.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Victoria Azarenka Caroline Wozniacki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1482 101.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — 0–1 — -0.25
15 2005 1525 103.3 — — — — +24 — — 50.0% +0.63 — — — +0.52 2006 1527 119.1 +0.53 +0.91 1.137 52.5% +17 — — 47.1% -0.12 1–0 — — -0.46
16 2006 1570 128.4 -1.78 -0.93 0.897 47.6% +53 -79 — 46.9% +0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -0.56 2007 1556 117.2 -2.81 -1.82 0.860 46.7% +15 -35 — 46.0% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 7–1 (88%) 103.2 +0.40
17 2007 1817 144.9 +1.83 +3.32 1.118 52.3% +2 -215 -230 65.0% +1.17 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.3 -0.21 2008 1914 154.8 +4.79 +4.70 1.241 54.7% -5 -303 -228 69.9% +1.69 9–5 (64%) 6–8 (43%) 104.7 -0.96
18 2008 1873 154.6 +5.10 +4.52 1.274 55.2% -23 -60 -274 69.4% +1.66 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 100.7 +1.30 2009 1899 153.9 +3.97 +4.82 1.208 54.1% -27 -24 -64 69.4% +1.47 15–8 (65%) 11–7 (61%) 106.6 -0.77
19 2009 1940 165.5 +4.27 +7.62 1.283 55.3% +35 -48 -221 74.2% +1.69 6–8 (43%) 10–4 (71%) 101.7 -1.25 2010 2105 166.0 +4.94 +4.76 1.219 54.3% +27 -204 -284 72.4% +1.70 18–4 (82%) 8–2 (80%) 113.4 +1.46
20 2010 1948 163.1 +3.61 +6.46 1.229 54.3% +50 -169 -123 70.0% +1.62 8–4 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 +0.88 2011 1988 162.1 +5.76 +7.01 1.328 56.0% +52 -9 -153 74.7% +1.90 11–7 (61%) 10–5 (67%) 101.2 +1.97
21 2011 2020 163.1 +4.84 +7.25 1.283 55.2% +14 -108 -106 76.4% +1.97 9–7 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 100.1 -0.87 2012 1976 156.2 +3.80 +4.12 1.171 53.6% +42 -42 -144 66.9% +1.29 15–9 (63%) 11–8 (58%) 100.8 +0.75
22 2012 2179 172.2 +6.83 +9.26 1.391 57.1% +14 -159 -139 81.5% +2.40 13–1 (93%) 9–7 (56%) 107.9 -3.63 2013 1906 152.3 +3.39 +3.53 1.156 53.3% +82 -137 -61 61.0% +1.06 9–9 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 92.0 +3.21
23 2013 2127 170.4 +3.42 +9.80 1.286 55.8% +45 -52 — 75.2% +1.93 11–4 (73%) 9–1 (90%) 107.2 -1.19 2014 2014 163.0 +4.24 +5.25 1.216 54.2% +24 -280 -133 64.9% +1.45 16–6 (73%) 5–10 (33%) 100.3 -0.30
24 2014 1981 145.7 +1.37 +1.88 1.075 51.6% +69 — +2 57.9% +0.70 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.19 2015 1818 153.2 +3.21 +4.72 1.211 54.0% +6 -9 +74 62.6% +1.23 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.2 -0.90
25 2015 1985 163.4 +3.97 +6.66 1.263 54.8% +4 +65 +22 71.6% +1.60 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) 94.5 -3.58 2016 1912 146.8 +3.41 +3.91 1.191 53.8% +27 — -117 65.2% +1.25 8–7 (53%) 3–5 (38%) 96.7 -0.32
26 2016 2046 160.1 +5.89 +7.41 1.465 57.8% +75 -18 — 87.3% +2.89 3–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +0.93 2017 2004 161.0 +3.91 +4.92 1.202 54.0% +52 -146 -103 68.5% +1.56 17–8 (68%) 5–6 (45%) 103.2 +0.13
27 2017 2019 110.5 +1.49 -0.08 1.082 50.5% — — -2 53.3% +0.33 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.17 2018 1947 156.8 +4.39 +5.24 1.245 54.7% +6 -64 +24 67.7% +1.47 12–6 (67%) 6–7 (46%) 101.2 +0.11
28 2018 1892 145.2 +0.15 +3.55 1.085 51.8% +122 +74 +62 58.6% +0.79 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -0.47 2019 1845 144.8 +1.89 +0.99 1.069 51.3% +47 -6 +118 60.8% +0.70 3–7 (30%) 5–2 (71%) 96.0 +0.87
29 2019 1853 151.2 +0.69 +4.19 1.101 52.1% +42 +134 +85 56.1% +0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.5 -3.62 2020 1853 131.5 +2.36 +2.51 1.397 56.9% +35 — — 70.6% +1.71 1–2 (33%) — — +0.18
30 2020 1959 158.3 +1.76 +5.63 1.182 53.7% +34 +20 — 69.2% +1.50 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 104.8 -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 2010 152.2 +2.04 +6.39 1.179 53.7% +34 +16 +34 69.4% +1.14 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1941 149.0 +1.08 +3.67 1.112 52.4% +23 +72 — 61.0% +0.79 8–4 (67%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 +0.63 2023 1863 134.9 +2.02 +2.05 1.110 51.8% +58 — — 56.3% +0.56 1–1 1–0 — -0.17
33 2023 1803 150.1 +2.06 +3.24 1.134 52.6% +64 +108 +178 56.8% +0.84 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) 90.7 +1.56 2024 1845 140.8 +1.93 +2.73 1.145 53.0% +44 -42 +224 58.1% +0.77 4–6 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 96.6 +0.15
34 2024 1900 158.8 +2.22 +3.55 1.126 52.7% +28 +27 +154 64.0% +1.17 12–6 (67%) 6–8 (43%) 101.4 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1832 137.2 -1.16 +1.90 1.008 50.1% +50 +34 +224 43.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 99.3 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2249 165.9 +3.19 +5.72 1.211 54.1% +34 -41 -35 68.1% +1.42 123–85 (59%) 92–70 (57%) 101.9 -1.29 — 2154 160.9 +3.83 +4.42 1.199 53.9% +28 -90 -57 66.3% +1.33 153–96 (61%) 94–79 (54%) 104.3 +0.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.